netstat -an shows me an open "phantom" tcp6 port

Hi I'm confused. I've a new installed FreeBSD system. I'm running NFS, http, ntpd and a ftp server. If i look for open ports netstat shows me something on port 1000 (ipv6) netstat -an | grep 1000 tcp6 0 0 *.1000 *.*LISTEN But sockstat shows me n

too many open file descriptors messages since bind 9.4.2-P1 (port dns94)

Hello Since i updated my FreeBSD 6.3 dns server with the latest bind version in the ports (dns/bind94) my system is flooding my log with "too many open file descriptors" messages. Is there something i can do? Example: Jul 15 12:08:38 intern named[50840]: socket: too many open file descriptor

Re: too many open file descriptors messages since bind 9.4.2-P1 (port dns94)

Hello Am 15.07.2008 um 20:12 schrieb JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉: At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:13:11 +0200, Thomas Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since i updated my FreeBSD 6.3 dns server with the latest bind version in the ports (dns/bind94) my system is flooding my log with "too man

Re: too many open file descriptors messages since bind 9.4.2-P1 (port dns94)

Hello Am 15.07.2008 um 22:59 schrieb JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉: At Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:54:11 +0200, Thomas Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since i updated my FreeBSD 6.3 dns server with the latest bind version in the ports (dns/bind94) my system is flooding my log with "too many

Re: loopback creation at boot

Hi Steve Am 17.12.2008 um 04:33 schrieb Steve Bertrand: Hi all, I'm curious to know if the creation of additional 'lo' interfaces is possible at boot via the traditional /etc/rc.conf as of yet. Forgive me if I've missed anything regarding this. I'm still trying to blend some functionality bet

freebsd router project. Problems with polling?

fig option I can try? Perhaps increase the HZ to 2000 in the kernel or remove polling and try smp machine? I doubt that I can run the machine without polling. If you see 70% interrupt load with 300k pps without polling. regards Thomas Vogt

nat-t support?

Hello List Is FreeBSD 5.x or 6.x supporting nat-t? I checked the archive but didn't find any useful information. It looks some people are working on it but the message was pretty old. Any status update? Cheers, Thomas ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.or

(no subject)

Hello Does FreeBSD offers anything similar like trunk(4) on OpenBSD (link aggregation and link failover interface)? Cheers, Thomas ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send an

Re: trunk interface (was (no subject))

mands. I will try it anyway. Regards, Thomas Am 19.05.2006 um 00:09 schrieb Marcin Jessa: On Thu, 18 May 2006 23:52:40 +0200 Thomas Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Does FreeBSD offers anything similar like trunk(4) on OpenBSD (link aggregation and link failover interface)? Is y