The following reply was made to PR kern/125195; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ted Mittelstaedt
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, francisgendr...@videotron.ca
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/125195: [fxp] fxp(4) driver failed to initialize device
Intel 82801DB
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:07:50 -0700
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Glen Barber
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 6:56 PM
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ndis0 no link on 6.3-RELEASE
>
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> First off, sorry for the double
Open up your registry editor and go to
HEKY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Class\Modem\\Set
tings where is the number of your modem (example: 0001). On the
right pane search for a string value named InactivityTimeout. Enter the
new timeout rate in minutes. For example ente
The 3c905 driver is not very good. These cards are fine under Windows
but seldom work properly under FreeBSD. Most of the motherboards I've
tried them in don't work right with them. We do both Windows and BSD
so you know where I put these cards when I get them.
I'll be happy to swap a pair of
e
>the IP
whereupon she went to her administration console running on UNIX and..
and low-n-behold, I got a new one ...
>
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide
Book website: http://www.freebsd-cor
but if you do
something like using a very well connected network for one link and a poorly
connected network for the other, it can be as bad as 90/10.
Have you investigated bonding or multilink with one of your ISP's? There's
also a way to multiplex T1's together that some ISP'
there's a loophole
which would allow you out of the contract for ISP#1. For example
if there's a Service Level Agreement. But in my experience if
you try this your going to destroy any chance of a future win-win
relationship with ISP#1.
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PR
, but I'll give him the benefit of
the doubt and assume that when they purchased bandwidth to ISP#2
that they wern't aware that ISP#1 was getting all of it's bandwidth
from ISP#2. It would have been better from a use standpoint to
plug into a completely separate ne
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kris Kirby
>Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 12:04 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Wai Chan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: outgoing traffic load balancing with multip
will make UDP be horrible and
TCP be great. Tell us which protocol you want to "win" and
we can tell you how to stack the test.
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide
Book website: http://www.freebs
10 matches
Mail list logo
