DHCP oddity

2005-12-26 Thread Skylar Thompson
]) = 84 Does anyone know why this would happen? -- -- Skylar Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DHCP oddity

2005-12-27 Thread Skylar Thompson
Brian Candler wrote: On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:15:14PM -0600, Skylar Thompson wrote: While doing some network stress-tests from a dual-CPU x86 FreeBSD 5.4 server, I noticed that a "ping -f" drives dhcpd's CPU usage way up. I put dhcpd into debug mode and didn't get a

bge(4) and gigabit

2006-06-13 Thread Skylar Thompson
gotiate fine. I also had this machine running Linux at one point, and it negotiated to gigabit then, so the interfaces themselves shouldn't be the problem. Any ideas? -- -- Skylar Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ pgpiYbhc5o0nr.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: bge(4) and gigabit

2006-06-15 Thread Skylar Thompson
post to the list the output of ifconfig -a and dmesg and uname -a I've upgraded to 6.1-RELEASE, and it seems like the problem has gone away. I used to get lots of messages like this: bge1: link state changed to DOWN bge1: link state changed to UP but now I just get the link state