Re: CARP as a module; followup thoughts

a kernel. So if the patch doesn't penalize the non-CARP case much, I think it would be great to have this functionality for now, even if it's not the way to go in the long run. -- Simon L. Nielsen ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://list

Re: request for traffic generator tool for BSD

ooking at ng_source(4). Since it's kernel based it can achieve very high data rates, but it's less flexible in what you send than some of the useland generator programs. -- Simon L. Nielsen ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: [TEST] natd multipath patches

On 2004.06.20 21:47:10 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > If you have multiple xDSL lines or two modems to different ISPs or > cable and xDSL etc. then grab: > > http://phk.freebsd.org/misc/natd I think http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/natd/ will work better :-). -- Simon L. Nie

Re: [FreeBSD 5.2] Bandwith and packet throttling

interface. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] sudo ipfw list | head -n 3 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any -- Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team pgpq0FyWoZ7u4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: per-interface packet filters, design approach

default, all sets are enabled. -- Simon L. Nielsen pgpQ77yh1h0v9.pgp Description: PGP signature

enc(4) (was: Re: gif(4) and bpf(4))

"visible" from userland. Anyone, please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Simon L. Nielsen pgprTsjHzT28l.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: IPv6 for www.freebsd.org

w does). While IPv6 for www.FreeBSD.org would probably be nice, it does require that the real www.FreeBSD.org get IPv6 connectivity. -- Simon L. Nielsen pgpygqoUaYGXR.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Incompatibility between dummynet and PF rdr.

shouldn't have been denied on pflog. It wasn't very important for me to get this working, so I haven't looked more at it. -- Simon L. Nielsen pgpTaKwCHU5ZI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: strange limitation on rcmd()

thing on FreeBSD at least. > > (Thank heavens, I say :) Actually it is, but it would obviously be a stupid idea to do so any place where privileged ports are required... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] sysctl net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedhigh net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedlow net.inet.ip.portra

Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

n't see a problem supporting this. This is clearly much simpler than setting up a full blown bind with split DNS. -- Simon L. Nielsen ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [fbsd] Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS

On 2006.08.29 11:01:48 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: Hey, > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:50:02AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > On 2006.08.25 15:08:13 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Since a bunch of people have suggested other solutions I just wanted > > to add m

Re: ipfw keep-state problem

27; > rule. Yes this happens with ipfw1. You can use ipfw2 (which sends keep-alive for tcp connections) or increase the lifetime of dynamic rules. I'm using ipfw2 and it works fine - I had the same problem with ipfw1. -- Simon L. Nielsen msg08205/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: cant get out with two interfaces.

netmask 0xafc broadcast 255.255.255.3 This netmask looks very odd... -- Simon L. Nielsen pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: limiting connections per IP w/FreeBSD ftpd?

ppened recently. How about just restricting the bandwidth usage with ipfw/dummynet ? -- Simon L. Nielsen pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: patches for ipsec packet filtering support in ipfw2

ur code looks interesting, but since I don't have IPsec set up (yet) I can't really test it. If no committer picks it up right away, I would suggest submitting it as a PR to make sure it isn't forgotten. Then hopefolly one of the ipfw guru's will have look at it at some point. -- Simon L. Nielsen pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature