advertisements instead.
? Thanks in advance. -sc
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=39995.0
http://ouliakk.blogspot.com/2011/08/using-openospfd-with-freebsd-78.html
--
Sean Chittenden
s...@chittenden.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
CMP.
?? Any thoughts as to why? It doesn't appear that the current behavior abides
by RFC5735.
-sc
--
Sean Chittenden
s...@chittenden.org
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsub
ite/data center local
There were a host of convenience things that came for free with this, including
easy to identify what traffic should be on the segment, etc. DNS would be at
0.42.53.{10,20}, etc. Answering questions like "this data center's DNS server
is at 172.29.167.4&qu
it doesn't work on
> most systems (Linux, network appliance vendors included) so this working
> *should* be a bug, IMO.
Where does it say that it shouldn't be used? Which RFC & §? There are plenty of
RFCs and I haven't exhaustively read things, so I reserve the righ
ou be more specific? I read "other addresses within 0.0.0.0/8 may be used
to refer to specified hosts on this network" as an indication that use of 0/8
is intended to be supported.
> Regardless, why are you trying to do something that is unsupported by pretty
> much every vendor/oper
ent and useful, and the 0/8 network seems to
have been defined for exactly this purpose. I admit the address range isn't in
wide use atm, but I don't see a reason for it to not be.
The fix Andre made appears to be correct, and IMO, should be merge
have their firewall
rules reloaded (e.g. /etc/rc.d/pf reload) to reflect this changed default
route. In previous 7.X, pf(4) picked up this change without needing to reload
the rules.
--
Sean Chittenden
s...@chittenden.org
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
eer (e.g.
* after PRU_SHUTDOWN), and just have to play tedious game waiting
* for peer to send FIN or not respond to keep-alives, etc.
* We can let the user exit from the close as soon as the FIN is acked.
*/
Thoughts/guidance? -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sean
VLAN tag. You may
be able to have a default VLAN, but I consider it poor practice to
rely on default VLAN membership.
There are good reasons to have a default VLAN configured, but this
doesn't sound like one of those cases.
Stick with explicit VLAN tagging on your servers and you can&#
ifconfig_re0.11="inet 192.168.100.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
*boggles* That's hawt! 'ya learn something new every day,
thanks! :~] -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sean.chittenden.org/
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org m
This has long bugged me and tonight I finally snapped and had to do
something about it. Example output:
64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=935 ttl=126 time=33.824 ms
64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=936 ttl=126 time=29.138 ms
64 bytes from a.b.c.d: icmp_seq=937 ttl=126 time=28.262 ms
64 bytes from a
ore before posting,
esp late at night. *blush* -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
50/24 192.168.3.250
I'm unable to debug this problem further. Can someone shed some light
onto this and/or help me debug it further? As I've said, I can't even
break to a debugger or get at the machine via a serial connection. :(
Help? -sc
ed, then everything
goes apeshit. Regardless, thanks for the obvious fix... still not sure
why it does this though. If someone doesn't pick it up in the next
week, I'll file a PR so it doesn't get lost. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
___
ee to turn
mpsafenet off. :)
cd /usr/src/sys/netinet
fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~csjp/ip_fw2.c.1099500281.diff
patch -p0 < ip_fw2.c.1099500281.diff
cd /usr/src
make buildkernel
make installkernel
shutdown -r now
sysctl debug.mpsafenet=0
-sc
--
Se
27;s working well for me. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
e(2). Until then, any local TCP load balancer
that uses kqueue(2) would also solve your problem (I'm not aware of any
off the top of my head... pound(8) does, but it is only used for HTTP
and is not a reverse proxy) and would likely prevent you from having
your pr
he problem).
>
>
> Primus
> --
>
> The first is that when you create a socket, and bind it to a
> specific local IP address, and then connect, it fails to
> allocate an automatic port private to the socket; specifically:
--
Sean Chittenden
PGP signature
ween rekeying?
Along similar lines, given that rekeying can be done lazily,
would it be possible to rekey through the use of an external program
that would be called by cron? If TCP sessions are going to be dropped,
I want to be able to control, know, and plan when without giving up the
adde
I think enough of you guys would have an interest in this. The
guys at CNDS do some really nifty stuff: worth checking out. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
Hi,
We at the Center for Networking and Distributed Systems at Johns Hopkins University
(http://www.cnds.jhu.edu) are happy to
> The only real "cisco only" protocol is the PAgP (Port Aggregation
> Protocol) which is essentially just a FEC auto-negiotation protocol they
> made up. AFAIK noone other then Cisco actually implements this though.
Don't forget to add EIGRP and CDP to the list. -sc
f-duplex
and you should see more normal flow. Why would you want half-duplex
anyway? -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
and look for some discussion regarding
samba performance, I wonder if you can tweak a TCP setting or two.
What version are you running? Any rate shapping (stranger things have
happened)? -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
ility to turn off the incoming data, I did so upstream, and once
I activated the service again, I was able to observe that my mbuf
utilization went from 50K mbuf's to 65K in roughly 2sec... granted
this isn't a fair test of 'normal.'
--
Sean Chittenden
msg07294/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ecords and
*poof* instant clustering. This works better with UDP than it does
TCP, but still... I've gotten 150Mbps off of my NFS server by doing
that. Can't say as its graceful, but it's certainly a poor-man's way
of getting more than 100Mbps of capacity.
Julien, know of a be
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> Sean Chittenden wrote:
> >... Can't say as its graceful, but it's certainly a poor-man's way
> >of getting more than 100Mbps of capacity.
>
> have you tried this?
> http:
> the cisco bonding (ng_nge from Bill Paul, though it doesn't really
> use netgraph properly) and the netgraph atm stack.
I just noticed you commit this, very cool. I'll have to play with this
as soon as it's MFC'd. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
To Unsubscribe: send mail
at the TODO, I realize that this patch isn't 100% yet, but can
it be broken down into a smaller set of commits?
Anyone doing virtual hosting would kill to have this functionality in
FreeBSD right now. -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
\
O O ) /|
`-^--'`< '
(_.) _ ) /
`.___/`/
`-' /
<. __ / __ \
<|O)))==) \) /
<'`--' `.__,' \
||
\ /
__( (_ / \__
,' ,-' |\
`--{__)\/
--
Sean Chittenden
29 matches
Mail list logo
