mpd pptp packet loss xp client

list of allowed ports without success. Peter Brezny purplecat.net 828-250-9446 ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

named in a sand box.

riviliged user. But when i posed a related question on -questions, someone told me that sandbox = chrooted environment. I also want to know, if you are running named under an unpriviliged user, is it worth the extra trouble to run it chrooted? Thanks for your help. Peter Brezny SysAdmin

No Subject

and in order to keep things functioning until it's done, I'm gong to have to keep both the inside and outside nic's plugged into the same switch (which gives a lot of errors like this). /kernel: arp: 10.10.1.70 is on rl0 but got reply from (mac) on fpx0 TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Service

RE: (forw) Two NICs In FreeBSD

I find it useful, and not that big of a deal to shut off in syslog.conf. However, option c seems like a good idea. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bosko Milekic Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 11

RE: Problem with Multihomed Machine

ave a look at   http://www.bsdtoday.com/2000/December/Features359.html for yet another nat/ipfw how to. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SeanSent: Friday, January 05, 2001 4:31 AMTo: [EMAIL PROT

general question re: PTR records.

I've read through all of ch4 in dns & bind, and haven't come across anything that says you couldn't do it this way... Will named accept this? Is it just a really bad idea? TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubsc

moving secondary name servers to primary

ndary files. TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Redundant connections from separate isp's possible?

do i tell internic?...ns1 -->network range 1, ns2 -->network range 2 and have the name server hold an IP from each isp's network range? Thanks for your comments/suggestions. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

ipfw not allowing udp?

zone transfers require more than just port 53? TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

dns; default primary zone files get hard coded origin's on secondary.

first.domain.that.got.looked.up mailin a ip.of.mail.com Is there a way to get around this? my primary server is running bind 8.2.3-T6b and the slave server is running bind 8.1.2 Thanks in advance for your help. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send

kernel arp messages with 2 nics, sysctl cntrl?

I thought I rememberd someone mentioning a sysctl control for turning off the kernel arp messages when you have two nics on the same (misconfigured) network, but I couldn't find it in the archives. Anyone know? Thanks. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [

ipfw and dns

27;s perform an nslookup using my box as the server to do the queries on. TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

ipfw not allowing dns traffic

nslookup's fail from outside the firewall on another machine in nslookup with server set to my firewall machine. What have i missed? Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

sysctl -w net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface=0 not working

iable stoped working? Feb 21 09:48:22 bsd1 /kernel: arp: 209.16.228.140 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:10:4b:99:7f: 6e on rl0 TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

ipfw simple quesiton

Hello, I've just added a second external interface to a machine. I'd like to not have to duplicate all the rules that involve outside interfaces. I've got rules like $fwcmd add deny all from 0.0.0.0/8 to any in via $oif is it possible to specify multiple interfaces for one rule by l

nat forwarding

After reading through the natd man page, I think I understand what I need to do to redirect requests to one specified ip to another, however, I don't understand where I put this config info. i currently start natd with rc.conf with the following lines: natd_enable="YES" #natd_config="/etc/rc.nat

DNS problems with hub.freebsd.org

--> 209.16.228.150 Could someone please bump that system and have it update the cache.?... TIA Peter Brezny To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

static nat problem

I want to be able to forward all traffic coming to an external ip to an internal ip. I currently have nat configured and working so that all private internal addresses are translated to a public ip as they leave the firewall machine on their way out, but after reading the man page a couple of tim

natd - static nat on multiple aliased ip's

Let's say I had two internal subnets that i'd like to nat with different external ip's, while also doing static nat on one of each of the internal ip's. Could i do that by doing something like thils: rc.conf natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf1" natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf2" rc.firewall $fwcmd add

advice on network plan

| 10.30.x.x--fbsd-gw_ipfw--wireless ethernet--fbsd_gw_ipfw customer networkcustomer network Your suggestions and criticisms are appreciated. Peter Brezny purplecat.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

route clarification

I've managed to get things working, but I've still got a question or two. Here's what i'm working with > internet firewal/nat box client firewall client lan. >pub pub/10.30.1.110.30.1.20/10.20.21.1 10.20.21.x >From Right to Left, each machine's default GW is

problem with secondary dns update through ipfw firewall

I've got a problem with secondary DNS servers not being able to get updates from my primary through it's firewall. The firewall rules on the primary dns server (pertaining to dns) look like this. I thought I had my bases covered... # Allow DNS traffic from internet to query your DNS (for

An interesting static nat problem.

I've recently run into an interesting problem. I've got an external machine x.x.x.y running static nat on it's external interface to translate x.x.x.x to 10.30.1.20 on the inside. The 10.30.1.20 machine runs a mail server. This external machine is also configured as a secondary mx for the inte

kern secure level 2 and mpd-netgraph dialup

Is it possible to have a kern_securelevel="2" and still run mpd-netgraph using the default 'dialin' configuration? I've not had any luck but things appear to work ok when the kern_securelevel="0" One problem even then however, again using the default 'dialin' configuration, once the connection i

running two instances of bind

I'm attempting to get two instances of bind running on the same machine. When I start the second instance, i get this error: named[15794]: ctl_server: bind: /var/run/ndc: Address already in use However it each instance of named can be found with a ps wax|grep named, and it appears that each can

three nics, two networks, simple routing problem...

What have I missed? TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. my rc.conf looks like this. ifconfig_xl0="inet 10.30.1.30 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_xl1="inet 10.30.1.31 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_xl2="inet 10.20.30.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" xl1 is the iface

dual dns weirdness, DNS/bind guru needed.

I've managed to get two different instances of bind running on my primary name server, but there's something weird. Since I've gotten them running. I can't ftp to anything from the box, or even ftp through that box if a client is using it as a gateway, yet nslookup appears to work fine. my res

dual dns box, ssh/ftp no like.

I have two separate instances of named running on a system. One for internal and one for external. The dns appears to work fine. With nslookup, you can choose which ever server you desire, and it provides answers. if i try to run an application that uses dns on this machine however, it bombs.

three nics, two networks, simple routing problem...i think.

What have I missed? TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. my rc.conf looks like this. ifconfig_xl0="inet 10.30.1.30 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_xl1="inet 10.30.1.31 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_xl2="inet 10.20.30.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" xl1 is the iface

mpdnetgraph connection refused

ed by peer Which peer is the log refering to? ideas? I've attached the complete log of the connection that failed below. TIA. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. May 25 16:43:23 gkgw mpd: mpd: PPTP connection from 208.63.181.154:1123 May 25 16:43:23 gkgw mpd: pptp0: attached to connection with

how to find dhclient ip for use in ipfw ruleset?

ter with a dynamically assigned ip. I've gotten dhclient working, but i'm stumped as to how to get the dynamically assigned ip address into the ruleset. TIA Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

simple mpd-netgraph quesiton

i ng0 pptp pptp ... pptp2: new -i ng0 pptp pptp OR, do I need to do something like this? pptp1: new -i ng0 pptp pptp1 ... pptp2: new -i ng1 pptp pptp2 Thanks for your help. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubsc

FW: simple mpd-netgraph quesiton

I just found this explained in the latest sample conf file. Sorry for the previous post. The original conf file I was looking at didn't have it as completely explained. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On B

need help with divert to avoid dual dns..is it possible?

imilar to -unregistered_only where I could specify that natd translate _only_ addresses coming into the internal interface bound for specific addresses listed in natd.conf for static nat? OR... is there another way to do this without using a divert socket, something just within ipfw. Thanks a lot

mpd-netgraph on minimal install not working.

rt 1723 as being available. The system has no firewall in place and is using the generic kernel configuration. I've instaled mpd-netgraph and configured it for use as a PPTP VPN server on the standard 'developer' install configuration of freebsd with complete success. What have I m

simple static NAT question

local address (192.168.0.4), but outgoing traffic from the first two addresses will still be aliased to appear from the specified public_addr. Thanks in advance. Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "u

dual dns resolution problem

his message. Thanks for your help! Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net Internal instance: // $FreeBSD: src/etc/namedb/named.conf,v 1.6.2.2 2001/03/05 13:34:52 asmodai Exp $ // options { directory "/etc/namedb-int"; forwarders { 63.167.198

RE: dual dns resolution problem -- Solved

/NIS configured, uncomment the next line # nis Thanks for your consideration. Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

icmp 5

via xl0 Where the host has only the following icmp types allowed. # Allow required ICMP $fwcmd add allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 3,4,11,12 keep-state Thanks, Peter Brezny purplecat.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

NATD theoretical max and tuning question

e cpu. Is a system of this class adequate for what I am trying to do? Would I be better off assinging a separate public IP for each of the private networks routed behind it? TIA Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in

RE: NATD theoretical max and tuning question

. Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net -Original Message- From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 4:29 AM To: Joost Bekkers Cc: Peter Brezny; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NATD theoretical max and tuning question Actually, following other reports on natd

currently experiencing some kind of DOS attack? Need help!

44.46 The error i'm getting in /var/log/messages: Jun 5 10:05:51 rack /kernel: m_clalloc failed, consider increase NMBCLUSTERS value Jun 5 10:05:51 rack /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet dropped! Any help is much appreciated. Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net 09:56:44.778211 208

RE: currently experiencing some kind of DOS attack? Need help!

Discovered this is not a DOS attack, Thanks for your consideration. Looks like my qmail install is sending things out faster than my network card can handle?... Thanks again, Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net -Original Message- From: Peter Brezny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday

limiting directed broadcasts with ipfw.

I did a quick search through the man page, but didn't come up with anything right off that looked like it could help mitigate smurf attacks similar to the cisco: no ip directed-broadcast feature. Is there a way? TIA Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT

freebsd vs. Cisco for two t1's

e the best path out to the internet. It would be nice to run picobsd for this system, or boot it off a flash card so as not to have to worry about drives. Any comments or suggestions are welcome. TIA Peter Brezny purplecat.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

or syntx for ipfw

I'm having problems with the syntax (i think) of using "or" in ipfw rules. Does this work only with ipfw2? i'm attempting: ipfw add 300 deny log all from \{ not 208.133.x.x/2x or 12.150.x.x/2x \} to any out via oif and i'm getting: ipfw: hostname ``{'' unkno

passive mode ftp server, need stateful ipfw rule.

o the new random data port on the passive mode server, i've so far not been able to come up with decent firewall rules to protect this type of system. TIA, Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

RE: passive mode ftp server, need stateful ipfw rule.

w all from any to any established arn't you sort of setting yourself up. Couldn't someone establish a valid connection to a valid port, then, have a field day? TIA Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net -Original Message- From: Orville R. Weyrich_Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mond

RE: passive mode ftp server, need stateful ipfw rule.

tion terminates. Thanks again. Peter Brezny Skyrunner.net -Original Message- From: Vincent Jardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:32 AM To: Barney Wolff; Peter Brezny Cc: Orville R. Weyrich_Jr; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: passive mode ftp server, need sta