kern/121298: [panic] Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode (em0 taskq)

2008-08-31 Thread Pekka Savola
The following reply was made to PR kern/121298; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: kern/121298: [panic] Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode (em0 taskq) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 08:14:42 +0300 (EEST) FYI, I g

Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-23 Thread Pekka Savola
.0 0.0 00 ?? DL 19Aug04 0:32.02 (pagedaemon) root 2 0.0 0.0 00 ?? DL 19Aug04 0:00.00 (taskqueue) root 1 0.0 0.3 544 200 ?? ILs 19Aug04 0:01.09 /sbin/init -- root 78285 0.0 0.4 420 216 p1 R+5:23PM 0:00.00 ps auxwww -- Pekka Savol

Re: (KAME-snap 8790) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-24 Thread Pekka Savola
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:03:47 +0300 (EEST), > >>>>> Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > After the system has been up for a while (a couple of we

Re: (KAME-snap 8792) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-24 Thread Pekka Savola
source of leakage. > 2. if you specify the "link2" flag on the stf interface, what if you >do not specify it? (if such operation is acceptable in your >environment) The flag is not specified. > 3. if you can replace the kernel with KAME snap versions, do you see >

Re: (KAME-snap 8794) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-25 Thread Pekka Savola
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:39:32 +0300 (EEST), > >>>>> Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >> 1. do you see massive number of entries with &qu

Re: (KAME-snap 8807) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-29 Thread Pekka Savola
a quick reset]. Maybe I should have set it up at reboot before the system was in a 'bad' shape.. Speaking of 6to4, if_stf.c does not support setting the MTU, because there's no ioctl handler for it. It wouldn't IMHO hurt to be able to raise it from the glued-in default of 1280..

Re: (KAME-snap 8816) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-29 Thread Pekka Savola
> Does it mean the kernel hanged (you could not type anything from the > keyboard, etc)? Unfortunately, I can't. The when my SSH session froze, and the 6to4 SSH sessions as well, my first instinct was 'oh, crap', and knee-jerk push of reset button (because the bo

Re: (KAME-snap 8820) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-30 Thread Pekka Savola
there any particular reason why net.inet.ip.rtexpire automatically dynamically re-adjusts itself (here, it's typically around 10 or 12), while net.inet6.ip6.rtexpire does not? -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.&

Re: (KAME-snap 8822) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-30 Thread Pekka Savola
hether this fixes the root cause of the problem or not is another issue, but I guess it works around it for now. We'll see in a week or two, I guess.. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oykingdom bleeds." Sys

Re: (KAME-snap 8847) MUT of stf (Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE)

2004-10-19 Thread Pekka Savola
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > Forgot to respond to this point: > > >>>>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:32 +0300 (EEST), > >>>>> Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Speaking of