Hello Frank,
Welcome to FreeBSD and meet the sendmail daemon.
What it tells to you is that it cannot qualify your own domain name.
Maybe if you haven't left it blank it wouldn't. The reason why may be
very complex or very simple. I think the daemon is just a little
embarrassed to even thin
Dear Jordi,
In theory, on a Gigabit link you get 1 000 000 000 bits * second.
By default you have the MTU set to 1500 bytes which makes ~12 000 bits.
1 000 000 000 / 12 000 = ~ 83 333 packets per second.
83 333 packets per second makes 0.08 packets per microsecond.
1 / 0.08333 = 12.0 microseco
Dear Aaron,
i give up on searching for a Dual-phy copper fiber gigabit nic.
the search terminates at this 2004 article
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Ixia+Introduces+Dual-PHY+Copper%2FFiber-Optic+Gigabit+Ethernet+Testing...-a0112895579
assumption would be that Allied Telesis have made a successfull
Sendmail ssl server certificates cache where?
thanks.
Nash
-
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
"| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
wont work:
WARNING: RunAsUser for MSP ignored, check group ids (egid=10103, want=25)
can not chdir(/var/spool/clientm
Duane Whitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo=smtp.external.co... -Ac -t" just
>
how can i ask sendmail to give up an email to "another" smtp agent when the
destination user is considered local but not trusted to run a different
submit.cf basicly it could turn into a possible leak attempt unless its defined
in a local "but not really local" routing table which "implies not!
Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:48AM
-0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
>hi, i just dont see any options to make it work
>
> "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -Ac -t" works fine
> but "| /usr/sbin/sendmail -O ConnectOnlyTo
time to the sendmail documentation prior to writing
out the problems.
NASH!
-ty
Bill Vermillion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The door open and in walked trouble
- disguised as our our old
nemesis Nash Nipples, who uttered, at Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:27 :
> Duane Whitty wrote: Nash Nipp
Hi Marko,
Actually i dont find that load critical. I think those lines well tell that
actually the process is running 581m42s and now it utilizes 13.48% of available
WCPU which is a long run and hopefully successfull if no nfs failures took
place.
Im pretty confident that FreeBSD wont let a
Hi, sorry, im new to this FreeBSD but um, the only quick thing i can think of
is to make sure you have this:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel diskless_root/etc/rc
if yes then you might want to put this string at the top of your
diskless_root/etc/rc:
/bin/sh #which points your rc file to shell so that
Umm...
I hope you didnt cut this portion out of your diskless kernel
options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT
options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client
options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server
You migh also want to re-read FreeB
ipfw add 5 skipto 500 ip from 192.168.110.1 to any out via tun0
ipfw add 10 skipto 500 ip from any to 192.168.110.1 to any in via tun0
ipfw add .. skipto 500 ip from 192.168.110... to any out via tun0
...
ipfw add 500 divert from any to any in via tun0 #back to normal rules
ipfw show
0
wrote: On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:26:44AM
-0700, Nash Nipples wrote:
>ipfw add 5 skipto 500 ip from 192.168.110.1 to any out via tun0
> ipfw add 10 skipto 500 ip from any to 192.168.110.1 to any in via tun0
> ipfw add .. skipto 500 ip from 192.168.110... to any out via tun0
> ...
&
1. how did you uninstall routed?
2. why not alter routes in a script, you are not going to send packets
belonging to the same session in multiple routes would ya?
Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Baldur Gislason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
netconfig looks like a new bill gates out of FreeBSD box. u dont need it. chill
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: what the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a
Netconfig database and why do I suddenly need one?
no such animal in 4.x etc.
___
freebsd-net@fre
Okay, why not make it in C on the day 2 if not on the day 1 because u will
still want to do that on day x.?
plus the core point about constructing dirty packets is to gain understanding
of the process. i mean its very important to understand how do u form a binary
stream with a set of conseq
17 matches
Mail list logo