ce,
although I can't recommend any in particular.
--
Mateusz Guzik
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ther one is untouched.
I don't get this lor with r243186, but I see it with r243187.
I'm happy to provide more information if needed.
--
Mateusz Guzik
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
is still in head and no fixes were comitted (that I know of at
least), so I guess that you seeing this LOR on head is expected. :)
>
> On 26 November 2012 10:26, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:48:09PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> >> Rui Paulo wrote
> &
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 06:54:36AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Hiroki Sato wrote
> in <20121201.225004.2232262673795057435@allbsd.org>:
>
> hr> Mateusz Guzik wrote
> hr> in <20121201133609.ga5...@dft-labs.eu>:
> hr>
> hr> mj> On Fri, Nov
53 time=48.867 ms
> 64 bytes from 98.138.253.109: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=51.118 ms
> 64 bytes from 98.138.253.109: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=80.145 ms
> 64 bytes from 98.138.253.109: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=48.964 ms
>
> OK. So it is possible with BSD. Let's try to make it
The following reply was made to PR kern/135067; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mateusz Guzik
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/135067: [patch] [fib] Incorrect KASSERTs in sys/net/route.c
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:06:09 +
Hi,
this PR can be closed as it originated
The following reply was made to PR kern/135067; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mateusz Guzik
To: Julian Elischer
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/135067: [patch] [fib] Incorrect KASSERTs in sys/net/route.c
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 10:42:25 +0200
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:58 AM
interestng comment:
XXXRW: in6_ifaddrhead locking :>)
Dropping it here in case there is someone interested in fixing this up.
--
Mateusz Guzik
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, s
/bpf_buffer.c:183
> #10 0x80960a3c in bpfioctl (dev=0x0, cmd= out>, addr=0xf801fbd06b40 "", flags=0, td=0xf80221857000) at
> /usr/src/sys/net/bpf.c:408
> #11 0x807ac1df in devfs_ioctl_f (fp=0xf8002b3d9d20,
> com=3221504614, data=0xf801fbd06b40, cred=,
ould travel across the socket only if they get pushed out
of the cache (which would be rare), but there would be no contention.
This is a small excerpt from a reply I intend to write to the other
thread where the 'solisten' patch is discussed. It gets rid of the
accept lock contention, but th
__
> freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
--
Mateusz Guzik
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
11 matches
Mail list logo