On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:38:29PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working through various bugs and have come to a point
> where TSO is working on systems I have available for testing.
>
> This results in higher throughput on resource constrained systems, and
> less CPU/power us
The following reply was made to PR kern/175734; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, m.sp...@meta-srl.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/175734: no ethernet detected on system with EG20T PCH
chipset ATOM E6xx series
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:21:34 +0100
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 01:07:16AM +0100, Joe Holden wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to make rarpd behave, but it doesn't seem to want to listen
> on vlan interfaces, or at least not mine:
Looks like you are using a FreeBSD version that misses the following
change:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/bas
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 03:10:05PM +0100, Joe Holden wrote:
> Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 01:07:16AM +0100, Joe Holden wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to make rarpd behave, but it doesn't seem to want to listen
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:01:36PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> > msk(4) supported flow-control from day 1 with a hack and it was
> > re-implemented later with proper way such that it always announces
> > flow-control. However for other drivers(i.e vr(4)) that di
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:39PM +0900, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:45:00PM +0200, Frank Volf wrote:
> > Yonghyeon PYUN schreef op 7-4-2014 10:32:
> > >It would be even better to know your network configuration. I'm not
> > >sure why you have to disable VLAN hardware taggi
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 02:05:40PM +0200, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> Hi net@ subscribers,
>
> Simple explanation of problem:
> real situation, device with two NICs (arge0 and arge1)
> arge0 attached to PHY w/o direct access to it.
> arge1 attached to switch MII port (and have access to MDIO bus).
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53:48AM -0800, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:04:51AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> > Am 13.12.2011 um 03:50 schrieb YongHyeon PYUN:
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:56:22AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> > >> I'm currently writing a driver to conf
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:58:08AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 14.12.2011 um 02:16 schrieb Marius Strobl:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53:48AM -0800, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:04:51AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> >>> Am 13.1
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:24:11PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> ok, i
> o used device.hints to disable both bge interfaces
> o booted successfully
> o used serial console
> o ifconfiged bge0 to the normal addresses
> o and it is working
>
> i suspect that something sucks in bge initializa
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 09:34:04PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> ok, i
> >> o used device.hints to disable both bge interfaces
> >> o booted successfully
> >> o used serial console
> >> o ifconfiged bge0 to the normal addresses
> >> o and it is working
> >>
> >> i suspect that something
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:56:28AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Hrm, the problem apparently is that while when probing, the PHY
> > still knows about the media it supports, it just has forgotten
> > about it after the reset during attach. There was a change prior
> > to 8.2 which would turn this fr
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 02:14:42PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 29.01.2012 um 08:05 schrieb Warner Losh:
>
> > I think that the main issue here is that we have an assumption that we have
> > a tree structure. However, it is more of a DAG across different domains.
> > The hierarchy works we
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 05:00:38PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 29.01.2012 um 16:31 schrieb Marius Strobl:
>
> > How about adding the MDIO provider via multi-pass probing? That idea
> > of that model was to attach things like drivers for interrupt controllers
> > befo
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 05:21:52PM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>
> Am 29.01.2012 um 17:19 schrieb Marius Strobl:
>
> >>> We really need
> >>> to find a proper way of dealing with the constraints of the embedded-
> >>> world rather than to sprinkle ha
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:00:22AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I think for switches, that doesn't necessarily hold.
Err, what exactly doesn't hold? The suggestion about using multi-pass
probing was just for the case when there's a separate MDIO master
other drivers depend on. The latter would jus
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 05:46:12PM +0300, Mitya wrote:
> Hi.
> I found some overhead code in /src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c and
> /src/sys/netgraph/ng_ether.c
>
> It contains strings, like bcopy(src, dst, ETHER_ADDR_LEN);
> When src and dst are "struct ether_addr*", and ETHER_ADDR_LEN equal 6.
> Thi
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:20:29PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> >>> or use ++.
> >>>
> >>> i think it is always aligned to 2 bytes and this should produce usable
> >>> code on any CPU? should be 6 instructions on MIPS and PPC IMHO.
> >>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:46:48PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a Dell R200 which I'm trying to build into a gateway with a Sun
> QGE (501-6738-10). The cas driver fails to load the first time I try to
> load it but succeeds the second time. Is this a problem with the card,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39:44PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
>
> On 01/24/13 09:09, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:46:48PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've got a Dell R200 which I'm trying to build into
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:48:04PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
>
> On 01/24/13 15:50, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39:44PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
> >> On 01/24/13 09:09, Marius Strobl wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:46
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:14:51PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
>
> On 01/25/13 10:19, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:48:04PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
> >> On 01/24/13 15:50, Marius Strobl wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:53:30PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Yamagi.
> You wrote 11 ?? 2011 ?., 13:30:23:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've got several Hetzner EQ4 and on all these machines FreeBSD 8.1 runs
> > just fine. I've never seen this strange negotiation problem myself. But
> > maybe I w
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:32:08PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:20:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello, Freebsd-net.
> >
> > Thanks to Pyun YongHyeon, who point me at fact, that rgephy(4) used
> > with re(4) does autonegotiation always and all other, who hel
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:59:07PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:32:08PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 07:20:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > > Hello, Freebsd-net.
> > >
> > > Thanks to Pyun YongHyeo
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:54:29PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Marius.
> You wrote 13 ?? 2011 ?., 1:59:07:
>
> > Note that even the RealTek supplied driver always triggers an
> > auto-negotiation when manually setting the media though. However,
> > at the same time it also comes wit
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:27:13PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 06:39:25PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:59:07PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:32:08PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:41:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Marius.
> You wrote 14 ?? 2011 ?., 4:24:12:
>
> > found by ignoring the bits set in the "don't care mask". I've
> > updated the patch at the above URL accordingly and based on my
> > testing it now should actually work a
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:55:06PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:41:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> >>Hello, Marius.
> >>You wrote 14 ?? 2011 ?., 4:24:12:
> >&g
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 03:42:47PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:41:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello, Marius.
> > You wrote 14 ?? 2011 ?., 4:24:12:
> >
> > > found by ignoring the bits set in the "don't care ma
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Paul Thornton wrote:
> bge0: mem
> 0x9310-0x9310,0x9311-0x9311 irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4
> bge0: CHIP ID 0x57785000; ASIC REV 0x57785; CHIP REV 0x577850; PCI-E
> miibus0: on bge0
> ukphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0
> ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:22:47PM +0100, Paul Thornton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/04/2011 14:16, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > Looks like brgphy(4) also needs to be taught about this hardware. Could
> > you please provide the corresponding part of a verbose dmesg?
>
> Hopef
Hi,
with the addition of mii_attach() and fleshing out the generic flow
control I've pretty much brought the FreeBSD mii(4) in line with
NetBSD and OpenBSD as much as can be done without breaking the API
or ABI, resulting in changes that could be MFC'ed. As you're probably
aware however, especial
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:07:11AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi
>
> I fear the change is too big for me to review currently.
Given that the majority of changes break backwards compatibility in
some way I intend to
The following reply was made to PR kern/158156; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, j...@ntu.edu.tw
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/158156: [bce] bce driver shows "no carrier" on IBM blade
(HS22 with BCM5709)
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:3
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:34:58AM +0800, dave jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does FreeBSD have gpio bitbang api for MII? If not, any driver in tree using
> gpio-bitbang mii that I can refer to? Thanks.
> It seems like OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux have added support to gpio bitbang
> mii,
> and it's useful
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:22:38PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 06:58:38PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:34:58AM +0800, dave jones wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Does FreeBSD have gpio bitbang api
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:55:31PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:23:18PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:22:38PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 06:58:38PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:57:07PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:42:22PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:55:31PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:23:18PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:32:26PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:49:03PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:57:07PM -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:42:22PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > >
Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
for 9/head:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff
for 8:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mari
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> >
> > Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
> > rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please gi
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:57:01PM +0300, andrew bliznak wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-16 at 03:08 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 03:56:32PM +0800, dave jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:34:58AM +0800, dave jones wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Does FreeBSD have gpio bitbang api for MII? If not, any
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 09:34:11PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> sfxge: Remove interrupt self-test code
>
> It's not currently used; it didn't build on 32-bit and the previous
> build fix is incorrect. If we really implement self-tests we can do
> this again properly.
Yes, I've also already noti
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:18:28PM -0500, Jacob Owens wrote:
> To resolve the issue, Pyun first had my patch amphy.c , then the dc driver.
> The DC patch fixed my issue. Here is what i had to do:
>
> 1. save attached patch to /tmp
> 2. #cd /usr/src
> 3. #patch -p0 < /tmp/dc.patch
> 4. rebuild/inst
The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge card is in
64-bit PCI slot
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:14:46
The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Aur=E9lien_M=E9r=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge card is in
64-
The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Aur=E9lien_M=E9r=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge card is in
64-
The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Aur=E9lien_M=E9r=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge card is in
64-
The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge card is in
64-bit PCI slot
Date: Sun,
The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge
The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kern/128833: [bge] Network packets corrupted when bge card is in
64-bit PCI
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 07:09:39PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 01:32:46AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > I've encountered a number of PHY chips that need auto negotiation
> > kicked off to come out of ISO state. This makes sense, because the
> > ukphy driver never seem
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:27:28PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Kris Moore wrote:
>
> >
> > It was for a while in 9.2, but we removed it from 10.0 and later due to
> > stability issues we kept getting reports about. Haven't tried it since
> > then, dont know if
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:33:06AM -0700, Sreenath Battalahalli wrote:
> Hi
>
> I got a new laptop (Acer E5-573) that has a Realtek 1Gbps adapter.
> ifconfig after booting does not list re0 interface.
>
> Here are relevant lines from dmesg:
>
> re0: port
> 0x3000-0x3
> 0ff mem 0xb0604000-0xb
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:04:53AM -0700, Sreenath Battalahalli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will you be submitting the patch upstream to support the new device revision?
>
Hi,
I committed in r287768 and will MFC it to stable/10 in a week or so.
Marius
___
free
The following reply was made to PR kern/112654; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/112654: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a
Netfinity 5000
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:59:01 +02
The following reply was made to PR kern/112654; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Nagy Keve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/112654: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a
Netfini
The following reply was made to PR kern/112654; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Andy Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/112654: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a
Netfinity 5000
D
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:51:21AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:13:15AM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> > * Pyun YongHyeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > I thought nsphyter(4) may handle PHY hardware but ukphy(4) was used.
> > > Just curious, would you let me kn
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:35:59PM +0200, Volker wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >From the bugbusting front, I'm often seeing network related issues with
> unknown (new) PHYs.
>
> Can please somebody explain me how one is able to identify what kind of
> PHY interface is build into a system? Does pciconf output
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:55:34PM +0200, Volker wrote:
> On 05/12/08 13:19, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:35:59PM +0200, Volker wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> >From the bugbusting front, I'm often seeing network related issues with
&
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 05:08:09PM +0200, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> Details here:
>
> https://github.com/luigirizzo/netmap/issues/322
>
> Is it acceptable to commit the proposed patch?
As suggested by hselasky@, the outliner problem at hand is better solved
by a dummy if_start method in order t
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:19:42PM -0700, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> Sure, can anyone commit this?
The addition of KASSERTs like the below one to if_handoff() and
if_start()? Sure.
Marius
>
> Il 5 lug 2017 4:05 AM, "Marius Strobl" ha scritto:
>
> > On Mon, Jul
65 matches
Mail list logo
