oughts/objections highly appreciated.
>
>56 or 64 would be better for alignment, wouldn't it?
Yes, but then we need to change Junos' definition to
match FreeBSD's and we're not sure yet if that's at
all possible. Hence the suggestion to use what we ha
e-)loadable modules so as to help with migration and
validation.
Thoughts, feedback and suggestion are welcome,
--
Marcel Moolenaar
mar...@xcllnt.net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsu
a define that either old or
new drivers use to indicate whether they need full visibility
or whether an abstract type works. This then drives what is
defined/declared and how it's defined/declared.
--
Marcel Moolenaar
mar...@xcllnt.net
___
freeb
I think it's a
good investment and an enabler for structural ifnet rework.
FYI,
--
Marcel Moolenaar
mar...@xcllnt.net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
s not a goal,
but we do want to be able to pre-load the network stack that we want
to use and not have to worry about matching the H/W network drivers
with the stack of choice.
Inlines for the kernel proper and a stable KBI for modules seems to
match everyone's objecti
driver that can work with different network stacks.
It's definitely been on our minds to make it possible to
use macros for performance reasons when ABI stability is
not a concern, but wanted to focus on ABI stability first.
FYI,
--
Marcel Moolen
27;d like to see is a discussion on the functions themselves.
They're the result of looking at a single driver (or maybe 2
drivers), and as such may not be perfectly generic or logical.
As said before: we'd like to focus on an ABI-stable interface,
but a one based on macros should also be poss
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 8:42 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 24, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>>
>> I see a lot of literal "%s" in netstat's output on head. This on a
>> freshly built system from today..
>>
>>
(except not humanized). I’ll fix it today.
--
Marcel Moolenaar
mar...@xcllnt.net
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
been designed to allow different
kernel interfaces. It currently supports TTYs and keyboards. It
should not be too hard to have it hook into netgraph.
FYI,
--
Marcel Moolenaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
On May 27, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On May 27, 2008, at 1:12 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
judging by the bug reports when things get broken there are still a
lot of people connected to the internet via dial up lines in places
off the beaten track, and
On May 27, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On May 27, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On May 27, 2008, at 1:12 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
judging by the bug reports when things get broken there are
still a
lot of people
Synopsis: Unaligned Reference with pf on 5.4/IA64
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ia64->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: marcel
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 25 02:27:47 GMT 2005
Responsible-Changed-Why:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=81284
__
The following reply was made to PR ia64/81284; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: ia64/81284: Unaligned Reference with pf on 5.4/IA64
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 19:45:37 -0700
The problem is not specific to ia64.
Synopsis: Unaligned Reference with pf on 5.4/IA64
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->freebsd-pf
Responsible-Changed-By: marcel
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jun 13 21:22:54 GMT 2005
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Move to a more pf-focussed responsible party.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.
On Jun 15, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:23:50PM +, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Synopsis: Unaligned Reference with pf on 5.4/IA64
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->freebsd-pf
Responsible-Changed-By: marcel
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jun 13
On Jun 15, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 02:23:24PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
That entirely depends. If a struct ip pointer is constructed without
any form of casting, then one can assume that alignment is guaranteed.
The compiler guarantees to do so
if people make the statement that widening counters is not an
option because it slows down some platforms, I must be missing the
reason for it to be an all or none kind of issue.
--
Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAI
18 matches
Mail list logo
