I am running FreeBSD 9-STABLE (updated yesterday: FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #15: Mon
Apr 22 07:45:07 UTC 2013) with VirtualBox 4.2.6 from ports … the hardware is
using a Broadcom ethernet:
bce0: mem 0xf400-0xf5ff
irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci7
miibus0: on bce0
bce0: Ethernet address: 00:22:19
I'm having an odd issue with FreeBSD that I'm not sure how to trace / where to
look …
I have 6 servers, all identical RAM / CPU / Ethernet / etc … 4 of them are
running VirtualBox, 2 are running Jails … one of the 4 I just switched from
Jail -> Virtualbox …
When running jail(s), the servers
On 2013-05-06 2:49 PM, Norbert Beckmann wrote:
To Marc G. Fournier
I do not think it's an issue with VirtualBox. I am running VirtualBox
under Solaris. And I never had problems with it.
Guests: ubuntu, Windows 7, Linux Mint, FreeBSD, Chrome OS.
But the people of VirtualBox themselves state
get
> problems when using more than one VM.
>
> regards
>
> On 05/08/2013 03:49, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On 2013-05-06 2:49 PM, Norbert Beckmann wrote:
>>> To Marc G. Fournier
>>>
>>> I do not think it's an issue with VirtualBox. I am running Vir
Quick question ... is there a command I can run that will tell me if a
tap device is open? I know I can do 'ifconfig tap0' and see the 'Opened
by' line, but I want to do this within a perl script, for instance, akin
to how I can use the fstat function to get information about a file ...
Rat
t it would be similar to...
ifconfig tap create && export MYTUNIS="$?"
echo "tap$MYTAPIS"
/-- /
/*Jason Hellenthal*/
IS&T Services Professional
Inbox: /jhellent...@dataix.net <mailto:jhellent...@dataix.net>/
JJH48-ARIN
On May 10, 2013, at 1:03, &q
I just setup an nfs mount between two servers ...
ServerA, nfsd on 192.168.1.8
ServerB, nfs client on 192.168.1.7
I have a jail, ServerC, running on 192.168.1.7 ... most operations appear
to work, but it looks like 'special files' of a sort aren't working, for
when I try and startup Apache, I
7;t appear to be any responses ... so either all responses
were private to Robert, or ... ?
This is my last 6.x box, so it is not overly critical, but would be nice
if I could get it to work properly ...
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I just setup an nfs mount between t
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Rick Macklem wrote:
Since rpc.lockd and rpc.statd expect to be able to do IP broadcast
(same goes for rpcbind), I suspect that might be a problem w.r.t.
jails, although I know nothing about how jails work?
Oh, and you can use the "nolock" mount option to avoid use of
rpc.lo
/ hoped that things would run just fine ... am I wrong in that
assumption? Or have I just overlooked a key setting in getting the nfs to
work?
Any suggestions / pointers are most welcome ...
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.
sue all things considered :(
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'm trying to simulate a diskless boot of FreeBSD, as am looking at moving to
a more 'thin client' environment, using a Netapp as a filer to provide the
file systems for FreeBSD front ends ...
To simulate
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
'k, based on someone else's recommendation, I add 'nolockd' to the mount
entry,a nd postfix now appears to work ... since I can safely guarantee that
only the one host will have a
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Be careful; multiple access from different processes even on a single host can
still run into locking issues against NFS filesystems, or data corruption if
locking isn't available. You'
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
OK-- Cyrus IMAP uses a variant of maildir, so you're relatively safe even if
locking is not available.
So, just to get this clear ...
If I were to boot a diskless station using an NFS backend,
Thank you, this answers things perfectly ...
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Okay, next question ... if lockd is running, should fcntl locks work? My read
of the NFS_README.html above indicates to me that they should ... but if
1. how do I know what version *is* being used? showmount doesn't seem
to show that sort of info, nor does the mount command ...
2. what would I use in /etc/fstab to force it *if* I needed to?
Thx ...
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scra..
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 7, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Part of the recent thread I had about mounting nfs point to using nolockd to
disable locking ... checking the mount_nfs man page, it lists 'lockd' as a
deprecated option, but doesn'
,hard,nointr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,tcp,actimeo=0,nfsvers=3,timeo=600,addr=10.1.13.165)
I've checked the 'SEE ALSO' in both the 7.x and 8.x man page, to make sure
it wasn't some other command I should be running, and nadda ...
So, do we *really* hide this information,
that runs on FreeBSD that ppl are
happily using?
Thx ...
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org
pr 27, 2011 at 03:55:11PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Would like to find something that runs on FreeBSD that I can use to map
our network, preferrably dumping to a database, and grabbing
information like: interface / ip / cpus / hostname, etc ...
Server needs to run on FreeBSD ... needs to b
7-STABLE boxes, the 7-STABLE
boxes all work fine ... is there an issue with em/fxp devices and zebra?
Or am I overlooking something in my config?
Thx ...
----
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scra...@hub.org
In order to deal with a lack of layer 3 switch, last week I installed
Quagga/OSPF on all of my servers, and got it configured. Works *great* on
my 7.x servers, but, using the same config (and port), my 6-STABLE boxes
all generate the same error when I try and start up zebra:
2010/05/01 01:4
t contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
___
Quagga-users mailing list
quagga-us...@lists.quagga.net
http://lists.quagga.ne
27;t match what is attached to tap?
I'm not seeing anything to that effect in the tap manual, but the part talking
about 'control' seems to indicate that you can do this ...
- --
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
p qemu, I use:
qemu winxp.img -net nic -net tap -vnc :1
and I can connect via VNC, but the IP assigned to the image isn't pingable,
like it is on my desktop ...
Is there something with 'pre-aliased' interfaces that can't be used with a
bridge/tap device? Or have I ju
, October 27, 2008 19:46:02 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On my desktop here, I have a qemu-img of Win XP that is using bridging to
> connect to the Internet ... everything works great, eve
y look identical also
...
So, pointers to what I may be missing here? a sysctl value that I need to set
for this interface?
Thanks ...
- --
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 22:08:18 -0400 Michael Proto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I only have one VM running on one server ...
- --On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 21:14:28 -0700 Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:35:35 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrot
2008 01:38:38 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I only have one VM running on one server ...
>
> Ok.
>
> Here are some debugging suggestions.
> - /etc/sysctl.conf should have the following;
> net.link.tap.user_open=1
e a minute, which seems to 'fix' it, but that sounds more a bandaid then a
fix ...
Is this normal (I can't see how) or am I missing something with setting up the
bridge?
- --
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
tool, that I can use similar
to top, or systat -iostat, that will help identify the IP that is being
attacked?
Thank you ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECT
sed wireless at all under FreeBSD ... what do we support
*well*? The machine(s) are going to be remote, so I'd like to go with
something that is generally felt to be 'consistently reliable' vs 'cheap' ...
or, at least, somewhere in the middle ground would be nice :)
-
t;
interface to this, vs having someone have to muddle with flat files and reload
rules ...
Now, I just found 'Chillispot' in ports ... has anyone used this? Is there
something else that is better that runs under FreeBSD?
Thanks ...
-
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networki
s, so was wondering if using IPv6 behind the NAT would be 'simplier' ...
If possible, pointers to docs to read would be appreciated ...
Thanks ...
-
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed ... its only from the jail that it doesn't appear to
work ...
thoughts?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
___
[EMAIL PRO
xist on the fxp0
devices?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
hard coded
*after* playing with all three *sigh*
Thanks ...
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Charles Swiger wrote:
[ ...crossposting between stable and freebsd-net trimmed... ]
On Aug 10, 2004, at 4:37 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I've tried in bth half and full duplex mode .. full duplex, Ierrs climb
to be handling the load, is it
possible that the unmanaged switch that i have in place between the
FreeBSD box and the Cisco switch is 'buckling under the load'? Not able
to handle the packets fast enough, and therefore just drop'ng them?
The unmanage switch is a 10/100 Link
quot;Remove the network address specified.", to me, means that if one isn't
specified, nothing should/would happen :(
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
_
ne on the same machine ...
I'm plugging everything into a Cisco 2924 ... is there some way, either on
the FreeBSD side, or Cisco, of 'cleaning this up'?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscra
does it affect
things?
For instance, do I start configuring an 'ifconfig fec0' device instead of
my usual fxp0? or, does everything pretty much stay the same except
running that extra daemon/command?
any docs other then the man pages that I should read through?
Marc G. F
00.46.208.* C-class, so that
I can easily add/remove as required ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org m
n em0
MGF> In order to provide network redundancy, and simplify our scripting, with
MGF> have one network bound to one ethernet port, and the other network bound
MGF> to the second one on the same machine ...
MGF> I'm plugging everything into a Cisco 2924 ... is there som
sses
while not 200.46.204.2 and 200.46.208.2
That's cool, since those IPs are just for the base server itself, and
never get removed ...
Thanks ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy
re
IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6Q4L2-M), Version 12.1(22)EA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 12-Jul-04 08:18 by madison
Image text-base: 0x8001, data-base: 0x8055C000
Thanks ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Serv
r hte
FreeBSD box, or the Cisco switch) is "overly busy", that load balancing
would be beneficial?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
ince the servers are remove, can I configure one interface as a fec
device, assign its IPs over to it, then "add" the second device?
Also, where do you put your start up? SAme as a regular interface, just
throw it into a startup.if_fec file or something like that?
Marc G. Fournie
or traffic is a Dual Athlon (85 IPs) ...
the other that is high for traffic is another Dual PIII (21) ...
So, is network performance that greatly affected by # of IPs assigned to
the interface itself? Or is there maybe another factor involved?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Netwo
I recently setup a box on our network, running FreeBSD 4.4-PRERELEASE,
with ipfw and dummynet to do bandwidth shaping as well as firewalling ...
The machine is a Dual PIII 733 w/1gig of RAM and 2xfxp0 devices ...
I've got an /etc/fw.rules file that has ~1200 rules in it so far, and
still have m
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Krzysztof Zaraska wrote:
> First, is there any specific reason for allowing only specific 900 subnets
> instead of the whole 'cost nothing' network? How big is this network? How
> would this increase the risk?
CA*Net3 vs "commercial net" traffic ...
> Second, with that numb
psychopompus# ipfw add 00661 skipto 00708 ip from any to 136.0.0.0/5
00661 skipto 56 ip from any to 136.0.0.0/5
why is the 00708 changing to 56? :(
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Our network layout is such that our ipfw box is purely a pass-thru between
our router and our network providers router:
[our router] <--> [freebsd box running ipfw] <--> [network provider]
/ \
Looking at the man page, I'm wondering if its possible to use natd to
proxy port X coming into a jail to an IP:port that is sitting behind that
jail ...
For instance, I have two machines ... one holds the jail, the other holds
a database server ... jail is accessible from the 'Net, but the datab
Just a quick question ... how does the OS determine the 'source port' when
connecting to a remote site? is it reasonably safe to assume that the
lower of the two ports is the dest port? for instance, if I try to telnet
to a remote site where the remote site is running a service on port 6667,
is
I've got FreeBSD setup as a firewall to our campus network, and its doing
a great job of it, but we want to be able log statistics on traffic going
in and out ...
I have trafd running on the server, with it dumping its data to a
PostgreSQL database, but for every ~8min "segment", it is logging ~1
pipe 21 ip from any to $my subnet
I don't believe I could do this with ipfw ... $my_subnet == 131.162.0.0 :(
I fear the machin would strat to smoke, no? :(
>
> cheers
> luigi
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:47:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > I'
Morning ...
Been trying to get ncp* to work with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, and finally
found some docs that refer to the if_ef device for doing this ... but when
I try to do:
ifconfig fxp0f2 ipx 0x
and it gives me back an 'interface does not exist' message ... I have ef
configured into the kern
'K, will try that out ...
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, John Hay wrote:
> >
> > Been trying to get ncp* to work with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, and finally
> > found some docs that refer to the if_ef device for doing this ... but when
> > I try to do:
> >
> > ifconfig fxp0f2 ipx 0x
> >
> > and it gives m
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, John Hay wrote:
> >
> > Been trying to get ncp* to work with FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE, and finally
> > found some docs that refer to the if_ef device for doing this ... but when
> > I try to do:
> >
> > ifconfig fxp0f2 ipx 0x
> >
> > and it gives me back an 'interface does not
best I've found so far is ipaudit ...
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm looking for some software to basically analyse the traffic I've got
> going over a particular pipe so that I can work out whether or what to
> traffic shape. Can anyone recommend anything?
>
dd an unassigned IP to it, I'm
not hitting a limit on # of aliased IPs (currently only 21) ... and I've
tried with another assigned IP (unalias from fxp device, move it to em
device) and it too becomes unpingable, but works fine if I move it to
another fxp device on a different serv
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Barney Wolff wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 04:31:41PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that I want to move an IP from one of the other servers
> > (all with fxp interfaces) over to the 4th, with the em device ... I -alias
> >
e /kernel: em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
as if it brought the device down, and then back up again ... is that
normal?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!:
for around 20 seconds)
is there a reason why the em driver does this, and the fxp doesn't? or,
at least, why the em driver takes longer? it only appears to be the
server with em devices that does it ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.o
is problem ... is there anything that maybe I
should be checking before a reboot that may indicate an underlying
problem?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy
aybe?
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I'm having some odd behaviour with one of my servers ... it is the only
> one of 4 that I have that has an em device, and, from what I can tell, the
> problem doesn't exist on any of the other 3 ...
>
> The probl
to do a reboot on the server Monday, when a tech is easily
accessible in case of a problem ... but, before I do that, is there
anything I can do to possible debug this? Maybe something I can look at
that would show a 'leak', maybe?
Thanks ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networki
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > I have two servers on the same network switch, sitting one on top of the
> > other ... one is running an em (Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz) device, the other an fxp
> > (Dual-PIII 1.3Ghz) devi
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > I have two servers on the same network switch, sitting one on top of the
> > other ... one is running an em (Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz) device, the other an fxp
> > (Dual-PIII 1.3Ghz) devi
Just setup net-snmp, and zabbix to monitor it ... what exactly is an
Octet? 1 byte?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
red.
Cisco, of course, is always a big name ... but also expensive ... oen
recommendation is the xl 1900, but I can't find any specs on her at
cisco's site, so discontinued product?
What about Netgear, which I have easy access to? Or Alcatel?
models to stay away from?
Thanks .
t; oen recommendation is the xl 1900, but I can't find any specs on
> > her at cisco's site, so discontinued product?
> >
> > What about Netgear, which I have easy access to? Or Alcatel?
> >
> > models to stay away from?
>
or a 48 port switch it is 14.29Mpps.
so, the closer the Mpps gets to that 7.1Mpps, the better the switch
overall? I take it that has to do with the CPU driving the switch itself,
or is there other factors that help drive that # up?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http:/
e the switch
itself? Or is the 'login part' of the switch thought of the same way as
adding just another server to the network, for connectivity purposes?
As I said, stupid question, but for someone whose never played with a
managed switch before ... :(
Thanks ..
Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Don Bowman wrote:
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Please excuse this, but my experience with them is zilch ...
> > am going with
> > the HP Procurve 2826(?) Layer2/Layer3 switch, as was
> > suggested, but I&
76 matches
Mail list logo
