end your AS
to the ISP #1 route (the big upstream) so that it's advertised as two
hops, and then route normally for the other ISP (the five-year contract
one). The net result should be two equal-cost routes back to your NOC even
though it goes to two ISPs (really one).
Make sense?
-
P#2
> to the rest of the world.
Ah, static routes. How unfortunate.
Well, I don't have much more to add to this one but words. Ted has said
what needed to be said.
-
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD...
my K7-850 with
Barricuda hard drives (9.0). I'm using xl's on most machine (K7 as well)
with a fxp in my P166 with SCSI drives (sees only ~6 MB/s on a good day).
Any ideas? I've got 2560 total mbuf clusters on the P166; I can't really
think of much else to change to speed
until you get a public /30 for the WAN link.
I'm a fascist; I wouldn't have taken a link without a public WAN ip.
-
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
---
"Fate, it s
What's our current best recommended solution for channel-bonding ethernet
cards? Netgraph?
-
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | IM: KrisBSD
---
"Fate, it seems, is not wit
he IPSEC
tunnel even necessary (if I don't care about security)?
Finally, can FreeBSD bridge a subnet attached to a public interface on the
big bad old internet to the other side of the world?
--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said.
<[EMAIL PROT
tic IPs inside the 216.6.6.129/25 net (in your example) to relay.
I'm a little confused by this.
--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | IM: KrisBSD | HSV, AL.
---
"Fate, it seems, is
