the correct ipv6 behavior for interfaces with gif tunnel on them

Hello, I have a freebsd box with a gif tunnel configured. I observed that even if ifconfig displays MTU 1500 for both gif and physical interface, 1300 bytes ipv6 packets transiting on the gif interface are systematically fragmented while transiting on the lower physical interface to 1280 bytes. Is

RE: the correct ipv6 behavior for interfaces with gif tunnel on them

>-Original Message- >From: JINMEI Tatuya / _–¾’BÆ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: jeudi 9 décembre 2004 05:53 >To: Konstantin KABASSANOV >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: the correct ipv6 behavior for interfaces with gif tunnel on >them > >>>>

adding a teredo node into netgraph

Hi, I'm actually working on a teredo server/relay implementation as a netgraph node. Can you tell me, please, who I need to contact for an eventual integration of my code into the netgraph source. Thanks. Konstantin _ Konstantin K. KABASSA

atheros driver in adhoc mode

Hello, I'm actually trying to make some tests between 2 wireless cards supported by the atheros driver in Freebsd 5.2.1 release. Everything works fine except the adhoc mode. When I put both cards in adhoc mode, no packet is going out through the wireless interface even if the status of the interfa