Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> I am trying to generate (send only) packets at maximum rate on a
> 100Mbit ethernet, which means using 64-byte packets and, once you
> do the math (counting preamble, packet and inter-packet gap),
> results in some 148.000 packets-per-second (and just to get the
> idea, this
Gunther Schadow wrote:
> However, I understand that ALTQ works in the data link layer at
> the interface to the NIC. IPsec, however, works above that layer,
> even before the IPFILTER rules (on outgoing packets.) So, we have
> the following "pipe"
>
>IPSEC -> IPFILTER ---> ALTQ
>
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all...i just have one simple question. can altq work with ng_bridge if i
> were to use both of it to bridge and shape traffic? currently i'm using
> "options BRIDGE" in my kernel configuration and altq works flawlessly. i
> haven't got the chance to play around
> ady> Having the prerequisite agreement of the FreeBSD core team I'm
> ady> delighted to announce my intention of putting the basis of a "ALTQ
> ady> framework integration into FreeBSD" project.
>
> Have you ever contact to Cho-san, the author of ALTQ? He is also a
> FreeBSD committer ([EMAI
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Attila Nagy wrote:
> > >We have started a "ALTQ integration in FreeBSD" project which is
> > > headed towards integrating Mr. Kejiro's ALTQ framework into FreeBSD
> > > 5.0-current (and perhaps 4-stable later). The FreeBSD Core Team has been
> >
