gif(4) periodically fails to route packets

t makes a difference. To my knowledge its routing table is correct: default 2a01:348:6:13a::1 UGSgif0 2a01:348:6:13a::1 link#6 UHLgif0 2a01:348:6:13a::2 link#6 UHL lo0 Am I missing something?

if_bridge with two subnets

y are all destined for the bridge interface.) -- Jay L. T. Cornwall http://www.jcornwall.me.uk/ ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: if_bridge with two subnets

to route packets correctly across those subnets. That may not be how it works in practice. If it does not work, I would question why not. If it does work then I would expect the same behaviour on each of a bridge's constituent interfaces? -- Jay L. T. Cornwall http://www.jcornwall.

Re: if_bridge with two subnets

rver to the network gateway - previously it was the .22 gateway - and now all of the LAN PCs can communicate without additional routing information. Inter-subnet packets will bounce off the FreeBSD server, rather than staying inside the L2 switch, but that's OK. -- Jay L. T. Cornwall ht