.0.11 is-at 00:16:d3:xx:xx:xx
>
> As you can see from the above,
> 'arp -s 192.168.0.12 auto pub' on 8.0-current host
> seems not to be producing proxy arp's.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Hiroharu Tamaru
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
902/amd64 as expected. Thanks!
Could it be considered important enough to make it into
8.0-RELEASE at this final stage? Hope it will, but if not,
please consider to point it out in the release note.
Hiroharu Tamaru
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behal
Hi,
At Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:05:46 -0700, Li, Qing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have committed the code into -CURRENT and it's now merged into 8
> Release
> branch. So RC1 should contain the fix.
>
> -- Qing
Excellent! I'll try RC1 when it comes out. Thanks.
Hiroharu Ta
Hi
I am not sure if I am understanding things right, but is it
possible to forcibly disable ASPM in em(4) for 82573
devices?
What I wanted to do is to use Jumbo Frames for these NICs
and I saw in sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c that says:
| static int
| em_ioctl(struct ifnet *ifp, u_long command, caddr_t
7; on 8.0-current host
seems not to be producing proxy arp's.
What am I missing?
Thanks.
--
Hiroharu Tamaru
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
:04:09 +0900
From: Hiroharu Tamaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Warner and I concluded it to be very likely an "ed" driver
problem that became visible after Warner's MFC of Cardbus
bridge PCI interrupt routing code, but since
