Re: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE

2020-03-23 Thread Gerrit Kuehn
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:11:20 -0400 "Dan Langille" wrote: > > > I cannot use an SFP+ optic at the switch. The connection just > > > does not happen. > I just tried the other switch (US-48) which had one SFP+ port free. > Same issues there. Does the switch allow to select the link capacity man

Re: NFS Mount Hangs

2021-03-18 Thread Gerrit Kuehn
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:17:14 -0400 Jason Breitman wrote: > I will look into disabling the TSO and LRO options and let the group > know how it goes. Below are the current options on the NFS Server. > lagg0: flags=8943 > metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=e507bb What laggproto are you using, and what k

Re: RFC: NFS trunking (multiple TCP connections for a mount

2021-06-28 Thread Gerrit Kuehn
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:23:21 + Rick Macklem wrote: > I don't understand how multiple TCP connections to the same > server IP address will distribute the load across multiple network > interfaces? > I thought that lagg would have handled this? I don't think this targets multiple interface s

Re: RFC: NFS trunking (multiple TCP connections for a mount

2021-08-27 Thread Gerrit Kuehn
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 02:40:49 + Rick Macklem wrote: > >In case anyone is interested in testing and/or reviewing the patch, > >it is at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30970. > The phabricator patch has been updated. Please test/review/comment. Sorry for picking this old thread up again, but I

Re: RFC: NFS trunking (multiple TCP connections for a mount

2021-08-28 Thread Gerrit Kuehn
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:55:52 + Rick Macklem wrote: > >https://reviews.freebsd.org/R10:1e0a518d65488caafff89a4ecba9cfb2be233379 > > > >I guess I'm still too unfamiliar with the new code repository. How > >would I find out now where this ended up, i.e., in which branches > >(HEAD, 13-stable,