Hello,
What's the latest "stable" patch available for the latest 7.x source?
thanks
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
- Original Message
> From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
> To: Gabe
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Sent: Tue, November 3, 2009 2:41:14 AM
> Subject: Re: IPSEC NAT-T
>
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:00:30AM -0800, Gabe wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi.
>
>
> &g
% 249MB
2.0MB/s 02:07
./testfile.wmv: Input/output error
though that could be due to restrictions on the actual switch, I don't know
yet.
Any clues?
-gabe
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
Hey,
I'm running 7.1-RELEASE-p8 with ipsec-tools-0.7.3. And yes, this is a dev box.
Thanks,
-gabe
- Original Message
> From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
> To: Gabe
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 2:11:07 AM
> Subject: Re: IPSEC: ipsec4_common_
Hello all
Does anyone know how to enable nat traversal on freebsd?
I've got a site to site ipsec tunnel setup but clients behind the nat can't vpn
through it. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
/gabe
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
Ok recompiling now. Hopefully it works fine. I'll report back.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:39 AM
To: Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NAT-T + ipsec integratio
So far so good... Should I be worried that the patch file names have 'test' in
them?
-Original Message-----
From: Gabe
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:31 AM
To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: NAT-T + ipsec integration
Ok recompiling now. Hopefull
Hehehe no I was just wondering. I'm running 7 and the patch installed just fine.
-Original Message-
From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 6:53 AM
To: Gabe
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RE: NAT-T + ipsec integration
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 05:51:31AM
On 08.12.16 18:56, Gabe wrote:
> I have a nat'd box which obviously has an internal and external ip
> address. The box has a third interface which is configured to a DSL
> connection. My goal is for that interface to be activated if the
> external side fails so that outbound tr
connection would be almost
completely independent. Unless you can provide an example.
/gabe
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ay to accomplish this regardless of
the type of failure.
I looked into CARP but I am not convinced that this would do what I need it to.
/gabe
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any
put: no key association found for SA
>ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
>ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
>ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
>ipsec_common_input: no key association foun
key association found for SA 69.x.x.x[0]/04e317a1/50
Thanks,
/gabe
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
> To: Gabe
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 5:19:16 AM
> Subject: Re: +ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
>
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Gabe wr
> To: Bjoern A. Zeeb
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 6:18:36 AM
> Subject: Re: +ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
>
> > From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
> > To: Gabe
> > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> > Sent: Monday, D
- Original Message
> From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
> To: Gabe
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 2:25:32 PM
> Subject: Re: +ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
>
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> > O
> From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
> Subject: Re: +ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
> To: "Gabe"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, December 30, 2008, 6:24 AM
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Gabe wrote:
>
> >> One more thing; if you are c
> From: Gabe
> Subject: Re: +ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, December 30, 2008, 11:56 PM
> > From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
>
> > Subject: Re: +ipsec_common_input: no key
> From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
> Subject: Re: +ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
> To: "Gabe"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Sunday, January 4, 2009, 3:24 AM
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Gabe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >>> Ok, can you try r
> From: Gabe
> Subject: Re: +ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA
> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Sunday, January 4, 2009, 4:11 AM
> > From: Bjoern A. Zeeb
>
> > Subject: Re: +ipsec_common_input: no key
--- On Tue, 4/28/09, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> From: Scott Ullrich
> Subject: Re: IPSEC NAT traversal
> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "VANHULLEBUS Yvan"
> Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 11:39 AM
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Apr
--- On Wed, 5/6/09, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Gabe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had been travelling yesterday, ... here is the summary
> for today:
>
> > So how is it coming along?
>
> It's compiling; it's on might notebook since last
22 matches
Mail list logo
