Hi!
I am trying to create a common resource pool for a certain application using
CARP/HAST as described in [1]. However while testing my setup I ran into a
problem which I don't know how to fix or work around:
If I shut down only the carp interface on the master (ifconfig carp0 down),
the slave w
On 10.08.2011, at 7:48, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> What freebsd are you running on? I suppose it is release, because on STABLE
> this issue should be fixed -- the secondary terminates after timeout.
I was running 8.2-RELEASE-p2 and now just upgraded to 8.2-STABLE. This really
seems
to have helped:
FTP install went just fine.
Anyone here who has experience with a Dell R410 under FreeBSD?
TIA,
ferdinand
--
>> Ferdinand Goldmann
>> Johannes Kepler University Linz - Server Systems/Information Management
>> Mail: ferdinand.goldm...@jku.at Phone: 00437024689398 F
hope this option gets ported to FreeBSD? Maybe in 8.x?
TIA,
Ferdinand Goldmann
--
>> Ferdinand Goldmann
>> Johannes Kepler University Linz - Server Systems/Information Management
>> Mail: ferdinand.goldm...@jku.at Phone: 00437024689398 F
tested, I would
be willing to help out. Having the carpdev feature would be great.
Regards,
Ferdinand Goldmann
--
>> Ferdinand Goldmann
>> Johannes Kepler University Linz - Server Systems/Information Management
>> Mail: ferdinand.goldm...@jku.at Phone: 0
Hi there,
I just upgraded a FreeBSD 6.x machine to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE, and now I'm
seeing this same problem which has already been reported in different postings:
named[51769]: socket: too many open file descriptors
last message repeated 147 times
Obvously it is hitting the 1024 limit:
# sock
Ferdinand Goldmann wrote:
Hi there,
I just upgraded a FreeBSD 6.x machine to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE, and now I'm
seeing this same problem which has already been reported in different
postings:
named[51769]: socket: too many open file descriptors
last message repeated 147 times
I am foll
But performance is far lower than it should be. :-(
Kind regards and thanks for any input!
--
>> Ferdinand Goldmann | |
>> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |--00 |UNIX |
>> Tel. : +43/732/2468/9398 Fax. : +43/732/2468/9397 C
e any experiences with the Intel driver?
--
>> Ferdinand Goldmann | |
>> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |--00 |UNIX |
>> Tel. : +43/732/2468/9398 Fax. : +43/732/2468/9397 C ^ | |
>
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:29:35PM +0200, Ferdinand Goldmann wrote:
F> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
F>
F> >All I can say: I have faced this problem, too. :( This is not problem in
F> >polling, but in em.
F> >
F>
F> Thank you! Just now I downlo
. I now put all the locked IP addresses in a table
which is referenced by only one rule. Since I did this, the ierrs seem to rise
slower with polling enabled.
Have you tried contacting Intel directly about this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has been pretty helpful with em specific
problems in the past.
est their
cards are very different.
--
>> Ferdinand Goldmann | |
>> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |--00 |UNIX |
>> Tel. : +43/732/2468/9398 Fax. : +43/732/2468/9397 C ^ | |
>> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
abs_int_delay stand for). You should try to tune them through
dev.em.[0-9]+. sysctl tree.
These tresholds are very well explained here :
http://www.intel.com/design/network/applnots/ap450.pdf
Thank you for the pointer, I will have a look at this and see whether this
helps, and post the re
r polling.
, turned on
idle_poll, and set user_frac to 10 because we had some cpu hungry tasks
that were not a high priority.
I think I red somewhere about problems with idle_poll. How high is your
burst_max value? Are you seeing a lot of ierrs?
*sigh*
ing out the "wan" link at near
900mbps at peak. We were never able to get above 944mbps, but I never
cared enough to figure out where the bottleneck was there.
Forgot to ask - do you have fastforwarding enabled in your sysctl?
--
>> Ferdinand Goldmann
Pertti Kosunen wrote:
Ferdinand Goldmann wrote:
944mbps is a very good value, anyway. What we see in our setup are
throuput rates around 300mbps or below. When testing with tcpspray,
throughput hardly exceeded 13MB/s.
Increasing MTU should help to get better results, as long all devices in
e also used, using this patch:
http://www.euitt.upm.es/~pjlobo/fbsdvlan.html
Regards,
Ferdinand Goldmann
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hello!
Can anyone explain to me what that PILA stands for, and if this card is
compatible with the Intel Etherexpress PRO and thus allow VLAN tagging?
kind regards,
ferdinand
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
this card to work? I could not find much about
it in the mailing list/Usenet archives.
TIA for any pointers to further information or useful tips!
--
>> Ferdinand Goldmann
>> EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Tel. : +43/732/2468/9398 Fax. : +43/732/2468/9397
To Unsubscribe: s
sysctl. Does anyone have hints on performance improvement concerning interrupt
load?
TIA
--
>> Ferdinand Goldmann | |
>> |--00 |UNIX |
>> Tel. : +43/732/2468/9398 Fax. :
r two (em0, em1)
are sitting in expansion slots. I would like to change the order of the cards,
so that the onboard cards are recognized as em0 and em1.
I tried using the device.hints file, but without much success. Is there any
way how to do this?
Kind regards
--
>> Ferdina
t's the value of nmbclusters? Have you checked netstat -m? Do you see
memory requests for network memory denied?
- 50% interrupts on such a fast machine is quite high. I currently experience
about 30% interrupt load using two em(4) cards, shaping for about ~20
22 matches
Mail list logo
