could
> not find anything.
>
> I know it is visible on lspci on linux systems.
You can use lspci on FreeBSD as well. It is included in the sysutils/pciutils
port.
--
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-net@fr
eleased.
(The madwifi driver was never included in the standard Linux kernel,
mostly due to the binary HAL. The ath5k/ath9k drivers are nowadays
included in the Linux kernel.)
--
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
dth can indeed be a major win.
Most people, on most systems, have very limited need of 64-bit arithmetic.
--
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
an ntohl
>
> and
>
> man byteorder
But if you do 'man 9 byteorder' you will get a different manpage.
(byteorder(3) and byteorder(9) are different manpages, and even reference
each other in the SEE ALSO sections.)
--
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
_
padding if needed)
4 octets Frame Check Sequence
Followed by (at least) 96 bits interFrameGap, before the next frame starts.
For minimal packet size this gives a maximum packet rate at 1Gbit/s of
1e9/((7+1+6+6+2+46+4)*8+96)/ = 1488095 packets/second
You probably missed the preamble and st
ey do not
have enough in common for this to be a good idea.
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
e FreeBSD project is a bunch of dudes working on
> stuff they feel like doing, rather than there being some centralized plan
> to make the project successful.
That appearance is probably due to the fact the the FreeBSD project actually
is a bunch of dudes working on what they feel like doing (or
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 10:43:25PM +1000, Sam Wan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to download iso file of freebsd 5.4 release.
> Can anyone tell me a link?
>
> I want build a ipvs box in freebsd.
>
> Thanks
>
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-re
IME-WAIT state.
>
> Not sure what good this packet trace is; the only reason the TCP would
> respond with a RST segment is if the segment it receives is somehow bogus.
> Perhaps that the send sequence is outside the window. If the data is within
> the window, it might be considered an "old" segment that happens to arrive,
> perhaps out-of-order; why would the local TCP reset the connection for no
> good reason?
>
> louie
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Erik Trulsson
ertr1...@student.uu.se
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
re saying that if somebody manages to crash your firewall then
they should be able to bypass any protection the firewall was supposed to
give? I am not at all sure that is a good idea.
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org maili
are probably better off putting the files on a webpage somewhere
and just telling us the URL.
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mai
slower than a PCI-X card in the slot.
>
> You need 4Gb/s of throughput to handle a gigablt
> router. (1 GB/s full duplex times 2). 1x is 4Gb/s
> maximum. In my view, you always need twice the
> bandwidth on the bus to avoid contenti
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:39:57PM -0800, Barney Cordoba wrote:
>
> --- Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 01:27:46PM -0800, Barney
> > Cordoba wrote:
> > >
> > > --- Ingo Flaschberger <[EMA
4gbit
>
> homework:
> calculate with 7 ports.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ingo Flaschberger
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe,
as hardware checksums enabled.
>
> Maybe you should try ifconfig -txcsum?
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> Generate syslog messages like these:
>
> Apr 4 01:02:06 my.ip kernel: ipfw: 65400 Deny TCP xx.xx.xx.xx:60725
> my.ip.my.ip:443 in via em0
> Apr 4 01:02:06 my.ip kernel: ipfw: 65400 Deny TCP xx.xx.xx.xx:57387
> my.ip.my.ip:443 in via em0
> Apr 4 01:02:0
To maximise the available bandwidth one would want to spread out the chips
over these links, which this motherboard does fairly well, using three
of the four available links.
(And hanging the most important things from CPU0, so you can actually use
the board even if you have only one CPU instal
it seems as if one of the parameters the
daemon takes is which interface to use.
Relying on the order in which interfaces are configured seems
like a bad idea.
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
s
> a perpetual "Trying" message that just sits there.
Don't use "fwd" for this - it doesn't work that way (for one thing B is
unlikely to handle an IP-packet that is still adressed to A.)
Use natd and the '-redirect_port' option to natd instead - that
ition to "localhost"
> in /etc/hosts considered to be proper ?
That might be the only IP-address the machine has, so why not?
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
to be available on recent releases of all the *BSDs, but it
does not seem to exist on Solaris or Linux.
Now, if you don't need your program to be portable this is of course
not a problem, but writing unportable code should be an informed
decision rather than done out of ignorance.
--
Erik
rt
4-address frames, which few do. The wireless code in FreeBSD does not have
such support yet. (4-address frames is a necessary component for WDS, but
WDS needs a bit more than that. 4-address frames can be used with a normal
AP-station connection if both sides support it, but as I said few devi
ave a minor problem if you wish to rename {em2, em3} to
{em0, em1} while at the same time renaming the original {em0,em1} to
{em2,em3} but that should be easily resolved using temporary names.
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
t;
> FreeBSD ganymed 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Jan 21
> 16:07:51 CET 2007
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GANYMED i386
>
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
use. A quick glance through
> fxp(4) indicates that it doesn't do checksum offloading. I'm sure
> someone will correct me if I am wrong. :)
Some fxp(4) NICs support checksum offloading, but most don't.
The fairly common 82559 controller ch
just
picks one at random from the set of available port numbers. (Alright,
it's not quite random, but it could as well be.)
There is normally no relationship between source and destination port
numbers.
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
standards-documents to have an unambigous term
for a collection of eight bits, since 'byte' does not have a
well-defined size.
--
Erik Trulsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
27 matches
Mail list logo
