B> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:45:58 -0500
B> From: Brad
B> Yes, 2 redundant paths represented by a virtual L2 interface is what he is
B> asking for. VRRP is for providing L3 redundancy for the next hop. A
completely
B> different scenario.
I hesitate to speak for others, but I'm pretty confident R
JE> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:54:18 -0700
JE> From: Julian Elischer
JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
Ingress interface.
Consider: 802.3ad, ECMP, FIB, multi RIBs (e.g., OSPF vs BGP weight), VRF
I started working on all of the above late in 2003 on 4.x; the project
was sh
MO> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:39:25 +0200
MO> From: Milan Obuch
MO> > JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
MO> > Ingress interface.
MO>
MO> Sounds reasonable, one important point missing - packets locally
MO> originated/'destinated'.
MO> Other than that, fully acceptable.
IMN
BC> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 18:15:21 +0100
BC> From: Brian Candler
BC> [I]n theory you might be able to find a modem which is physically
BC> connected as ISDN BRI but which supports v90 analogue modulation)
Ascend MAX 1800 or MAX 3000
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A divi
