The following reply was made to PR kern/143573; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Earl Lapus
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, earl.la...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/143573: [em] em(4) NIC crashes intermittently
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:57:11 +0800
Additional note: the kernel's /usr/sr
Hi,
I was browsing through the ping6 code and I noticed that one
particular call to getaddrinfo() didn't have a freeaddrinfo() pair.
All calls to getaddrinfo() should have an equivalent freeaddrinfo(), right?
Attached is a patch that "tries-to-resolve" this very small issue
(applies cleanly on an
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> For all such issues, please file a PR first so it doesn't get lost. When
> you get the PR confirmation back, feel free to alert the list to its
> existence.
>
As advised, I've just filed a PR - (PR number: 144730)
--
There are seven words
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
>
> Yup, it should be good practice. But, this is rather intentional.
> The `hostname' variable points to res->ai_canonname, and is used
> later. This is why the `res' variable is declared globally.
>
> Sincerely,
>
I see. I was unable to
The following reply was made to PR kern/146534; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Earl Lapus
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, earl.la...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/146534: [icmp6] wrong source address in echo reply
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 14:06:45 +0800
--001636b14d02cd6f320487289c7c
Hi,
I submitted a patch which fixes the problem described in the PR and it
also retains this
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet6/icmp6.c.diff?r1=1.118;r2=1.119;f=h)
fix.
I also ran the TAHI (tool version REL_3_3_0; test program version
V6LC_4_0_5) phase 2 NDP test scripts and
Hi,
I just want to follow-up on this PR. Basically a working icmp6
functionality that exists in 7.x and below broke in 8.x and CURRENT. I
believe it's too late to have it fixed in 8.1. Maybe someone on the
list that really knows the icmp6 code can have a look and verify if it
is indeed a bug. If i
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:25 AM, jhell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have reviewed this, edited the patch and determined this does fix the
> problem. The patch is attached and is also here: http://bit.ly/clqhxt
>
>
> Regards,
>
Thank you, I appreciate the help.
-
