On 7/3/2013 4:06 AM, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi Julian,
I appreciate your willing to help me.
My Situation in short is:
--- [a] - [b] -
internet B |---BGP---|84.xx.yy.1 192.168.0.1|-|192.168.0.2/24
193.xx.yy.2| |Aem1 Cem3 D em0|
On 9/23/2013 4:50 AM, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
The project page is: https://sites.google.com/site/yartikhiy/home/ipv6book
Do you have a crowd-funding campaign for this?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
On 6/18/2014 9:36 AM, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I manage a /29 at $home. While I manage _real_ IPv6 on many networks
at $work. I'm stuck with 6rd at $home. I don't much care for 6rd. It's
still pretty much 6to4. But it's all I have to work with, given the
CPE's limitations. So, as I'm new to it
Chris,
On 6/18/2014 8:11 PM, Mail Delivery System wrote:
: host mx99.ultimatedns.net[209.180.214.225]
said: 550 5.0.0 SPAM and BULK mail REJECTED (in reply to MAIL FROM
command)
You might need to adjust your mail filters. :)
On 6/18/2014 9:36 AM, Chris H wrote:
Greetings, I manage a /29 at
On 6/18/2014 10:12 PM, Chris H wrote:
FreeBSD doesn't support 6rd. Ironically, pfSense does.
>
Are you sure?
There are even a couple of 6rd ports:
net/stf-6rd-kmod
and
net/u6rd
or am I to understand that _without_ those ports, FreeBSD doesn't
support 6rd.
Yes, if you bring in third-party cod
On 6/19/2014 4:57 AM, Massimiliano Stucchi wrote:
On 19/06/14 05:11, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
FreeBSD doesn't support 6rd. Ironically, pfSense does.
This is not entirely true. 6RD is about establishing a 6to4 tunnel to a
well-defined tunnel server in your provider's infrastruct
On 2012-04-29 17:03, Michael MacLeod wrote:
I understand that cone NAT is a generally terrible and insecure way to do
NAT, but game and application developers seem hell-bent on depending on
cone NAT behaviour. Is there a way to make it work with PF?
Not directly, no. In most cases where the ap
On 2012-04-30 17:44, Michael MacLeod wrote:
At the end of the day we could solve it by getting our ISP to route a
/29 to their house and using binat (I already have a /29), but it would
be nice if there was the option to use 'nat on $wan_if from ->
($wan_if) full-cone' in a ruleset to achieve th
Comcast does IPv6 using DHCPv6 and DHCPv6-PD. At least in 8.3-p3, the
in-base dhclient doesn't do DHCPv6. I installed the
net/isc-dhcp42-client port and am successfully using as a workalike
drop-in replacement with the following in /etc/rc.conf:
dhclient_flags="-lf /var/db/dhclient.leases.${
I have isc-dhcp42-server-4.2.4_1 installed from ports on an amd64 8.3-p3
machine acting as an IPv6 router using SLAAC and stateless DHCPv6.
When machines do DHCPv6 Information Requests (per the RA's O flag), I
can see in the DHCPv6 server logging the requests like this:
Sep 10 01:20:31 chombo
I can't find any hint of support for it. Did I miss something? If not,
is there any work adding support for 6RD (RFC5569)?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
I have a machine I want to do IPv6 routing. The interface out which its
sending router advertisements has multiple static IPv6 addresses
assigned from the same prefix. The problem is rtadvd is selecting the
"wrong" address for the router. The man page for rtadvd.conf doesn't
indicate how to
I have two machines where I need them to:
1. Solicit a prefix;
2. Apply the solicitation to a non-EUI64 address;
3. Use the non-EUI64 address as the default source address.
Retaining the EUI64 address is not necessary. Static configuration
prevents 1 and I have not been able to get 2 or 3 to w
Noah Silverman wrote:
I want to find a way to pass ALL traffic from my laptop THROUGH my
office VPN and then out to the Internet. This is a "road warrior"
setup. This gives me a few benefits: 1) I can check my email securely
through VPN. 2) No matter where I am, I will always have the ext
On 11/1/2014 8:03 PM, Chris Inacio wrote:
Thank you for all your help. You have indeed fixed my mistakes.
I still have one more mistake, however, which is that my internal network
interface isn't getting an IPv6 address, beyond link local. When I added
"inet6 accept_rtadv" to the config of re1
On 11/11/2014 2:31 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
In a conversation on questions@ re natd(8), Gary said he was about to
upgrade to 9.3 from some (embarrassingly :) old version, and I said:
>> Strangely, there's no man page for ep nor if_ep on 8.x or 9.x?
To which Gary replied:
> ugh. That will be i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Franz Klaus
> Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 2:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: go to the Internet by through a plip link?
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Alexander Vasenin
> From: RRrp Toren
>
> The IP addresses here were picked for demonstration
> purposes. The actuals
> set can come from anywhere within the RFC 1918 network
> numbers. So picking a
> good IP the 1st time, in the blind, is like shooting a
> bullseye on the first
> shot in a pitchblack rang
> From: Jeremie Le Hen
> jarjarbinks:sys# ifconfig iwi0
> iwi0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> ether 00:12:f0:2c:f3:6e
> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect
> status: no carrier
> ssid cyb
> authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100
> %%%
>
> I frien
From: Josef Karthauser
> I'm trying to get the iwi driver working on my sony A290 laptop. It's
> got a BG2200 chipset in it and the driver probes and finds
> the adapter, but it doesn't appear to work.
>
<...>
> iwi0: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect
>
From: Mrad James Deane
>
> hello i want to know how the www user with uid:80 can print
> on a priviliged port like 80 rather the root user im very
> in trouble i did not find a solution yet mac_portacl is one
> but it is very experimental please help. thanks
Most daemons that bind to "priveleged
From: Chuck Swiger
>
> People who have em NICs, and who do not have problems, probably do not
> report regularly that their Intel 10/100/1000 NIC works fine, even
> though it does, at least for them. I've got a dozen or so machines
> with that hardware, and I haven't seen any problems with them.
[Reflowed]
From: Benjamin Rosenblum
> Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>>
>> I'd be interested in finding out the specific chips with which people
>> are (not) having success. As em(4) supports an entire family of
>> products, rather than a single chip, it may be that so
From: Petri Helenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>
>> I'd be interested in finding out the specific chips with which people are
>> (not) having success. As em(4) supports an entire family of products,
>> rather than a single chip, it ma
Patrick Thomas wrote:
>
> This is very nifty:
>
> http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?grid=31&prid=402
>
> It is a 10/100 USB ethernet adaptor, but as you can see it is simply a USB
> "key" - no cables or dongles.
>
> Has anyone gotten this to work under FreeBSD ? I would like to thin
[Redirected to -questions from -net.]
From: S.I
>
> How Can I set ipprecedence flag on FreeBSD?
Precendence bits are part of the ip_tos bits in FreeBSD inet sockets. The
ip(4) man page gives an example of using setsockopt(2) to set the ToS bits.
See src/sys/netinet/ip.h (v1.29) lines 76 to 99 f
From: Max Laier
>
> there have been a lot of problem reports with iwi(4) lately.
> Can everybody who does have problems with it please take a look at:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new_iwi/
I'd be happy to give this a run, since I haven't had much luck doing things
like cvsup over my 2
From: Joerg Pulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > From: Max Laier
> >>
> >> there have been a lot of problem reports with iwi(4) lately.
> >> Can everybody who does have problems with it please take a look at:
> &g
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 19 March 2006 16:47, dima wrote:
the new version at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new_iwi/20060315.both.tgz
>>
The new driver didn't pass cvsup test at my laptop :(
It fails large file upload either.
It's definitely a flow control problem. Is taskqueue designe
Sam Leffler wrote:
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Are you referring to the problem in cvsup tests where it will suddenly
stop with a "Network write failure" error?
Yes. The issue was that when crypto was done in the host it was
sometimes being done in-place on mbufs still owned by
dima wrote:
I had a chance to test the driver more throughly today. It can't connect
to some access points. Sometimes reboot helps, sometimes not. I didn't
experience this with the driver currently present in the tree; well, I
used /usr/ports/net/iwi-firmware (not the kmod version). This can be
Max Laier wrote:
Let me clear up some things here:
1) This is not "mine" driver. It's Damien's with a lot of patches that I hope
to test by putting out this version.
My sincerest apologies to Damien and everyone involved. I was going by
historical convention where when someone posts a new,
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
I have the configuration at home:
notebook with iwi(4) - ZyXel AP - 100Mb switch - desktopPC(s)
When I boot my notebook it's not available outside - from desktopPC. But
when I do ping (or any network activity) from notebook, everything
starts wo
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
When I boot my notebook it's not available outside - from desktopPC. But
when I do ping (or any network activity) from notebook, everything
starts work.
Oh, forgot to say, AP is in BSS ne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your message could not be delivered. The User is out of space.
I empathize with the user. I have days where I feel like I'm
zero-dimensional as well.
--
Darren Pilgrim
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
Eric W. Bates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can someone please refer me to some documentation describing how to
implement NAT Traversal?
In what context? The methods required to traverse a NAT are highly
protocol-specific.
--
Darren Pilgrim
36 matches
Mail list logo
