Re: Application layer classifier for ipfw

You will go to develop a version to work with PF ? Mike Makonnen escreveu: Hi, An Internet Cafe I do some work for was recently having problems with very slow internet access. It turns out customers were running P2P file sharing applications which were hogging all the bandwidth. I looked for

Re: Application layer classifier for ipfw

Ermal Luçi escreveu: On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mike Makonnen wrote: Patrick Tracanelli wrote: To let you know of my current (real world) tests: - Wireless Internet Provider 1: - 4Mbit/s of Internet Traffic - Classifying defau

IPFW MAX RULES COUNT PERFORMANCE

Hi, My system is a FreeBSD 7.1R. When I add rules IPFW COUNT to 254 IPS from my network, one of my interfaces increases the latency, causing large delays in the network, when I delete COUNT rules, everything returns to normal, which can be ? My script: ipcount.php -- CUT -- sy

Re: IPFW MAX RULES COUNT PERFORMANCE

user. Understand ? Thanks, Daniel Julian Elischer escreveu: Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote: Hi, My system is a FreeBSD 7.1R. When I add rules IPFW COUNT to 254 IPS from my network, one of my interfaces increases the latency, causing large delays in the network, when I delete COUNT rules, everything re

Re: IPFW MAX RULES COUNT PERFORMANCE

Julian, You could give an example of rules with tables? Julian Elischer escreveu: Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote: Very good thinking, congratulations, but my need is another. The objective is a Captive Porrtal that each authentication is dynamically created a rule to ALLOW or COUNT IP

Re: IPFW MAX RULES COUNT PERFORMANCE

work, begins to display "em4 watchdog timeout". Ian Smith escreveu: On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote: > The latency in the interface em6 increased an average of 10ms to 200 ~ 300ms > Hardware: > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3200.13-MHz 686-class C

Re: IPFW MAX RULES COUNT PERFORMANCE

s a single rule. 2c, Adrian 2009/4/23 Daniel Dias Gonçalves : Hi, My system is a FreeBSD 7.1R. When I add rules IPFW COUNT to 254 IPS from my network, one of my interfaces increases the latency, causing large delays in the network, when I delete COUNT rules, everything returns to normal, whi

Re: kern/78791: [xl] xl(4) input errors and speed problem

Gleb Smirnoff escreveu: Synopsis: [xl] xl(4) input errors and speed problem State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: glebius State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 27 09:03:50 UTC 2005 State-Changed-Why: Please provide the following information. Is this one particular card that experiences

Re: kern/78791: [xl] xl(4) input errors and speed problem

Remko Lodder escreveu: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Synopsis: [xl] xl(4) input errors and speed problem Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: remko Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Aug 3 15:03:33 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Reassign to networking team

Re: kern/78791: [xl] xl(4) input errors and speed problem

Sten Daniel Soersdal escreveu: Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 02:21:39PM -0300, Daniel Dias Gon?alves wrote: D> > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback D> > State-Changed-By: glebius D> > State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 27 09:03:50 UTC 2005 D> > State-Changed-Why: Please provide the fo

Realtek Gigabit Network Card 0xd6088086

Hi, FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE can support this network card? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0xd6088086 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' class= network subclass = ethernet []s -- Daniel Dias Gonçalves DGNET Network Soluti

Re: Realtek Gigabit Network Card 0xd6088086

Pyun YongHyeon escreveu: On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:28:46PM -0200, Daniel Dias Gon?alves wrote: > Hi, > > FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE can support this network card? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x02 card=0xd6088086 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x01 > hdr=0x00 >vendor = 'Realtek Semiconduct

DEVICE_POLLING IF_EM CPU usage

Hi, I activated polling in 8 interfaces em0... em7 (ifconfig em* polling) to carry through performance tests, when activating, it had a significant reduction of CPU usage, load average measured of "0,50, 0,69, 0,52" for "0,43, 0,39, 0,21" and the CPU usage (SNMP Graphic) measured of 35% for 5

Re: FBSD 1GBit router?

Bc. Radek Krejca escreveu: Hi, ZB> - upgrade at least to 6.3. upgrading to 7.0 might also be better, depending ZB> on hardware choices ZB> - ensure your ethernet cards are on fast enough busses. 'em' (Intel Ether ZB> Express 1000) flavor ports are my personal favorite ZB> - enable polling (thi

FreeBSD 6.3 fxp0 MBUF and PAE

Hi, When using the interface fxp0 with PAE enable in kernel, occurs the following error: fxp0: can't map mbuf (error 12) ... it repeats, repeats and lost communication. Information: 6.3-RELEASE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4:0: class=0x02 card=0x00708086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vend

FreeBSD OS Detection and Uptime

Which methods used to prevent OS detection and uptime (nmap) ? http://nmap.org/misc/defeat-nmap-osdetect.html#BSD I tried, but not work. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send

Understanding Flags, Refs, Use, Expire in Routing Table

I would like an explanation on each field it command "netstat - rn", example: Flags,Refs,Use,Expire In Flags: UGS, UC, UHLW, UH Somebody can explain me ? Thanks, Daniel ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/

IPFW NATD = NAT POOL

Exists the possibility to make NAT POOL with IPFW + NATD ? -- daniel ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

FreeBSD 5.4 AMD64 & MPD

RET sendto 104/0x68 7108 mpd PSIG SIGSEGV SIG_DFL 7108 mpd NAMI "mpd.core" # Ifconfig: ng0: flags=8890 mtu 1500 Any idea ? -- Daniel Dias Gonçalves DGNET Network Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] (37) 99824809 ___

Re: FreeBSD 5.4 AMD64 & MPD

eed to update your ports tree and resintall mpd. Thanks, but look for this patch: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1263766&group_id=14145&atid=314145 -- Daniel Dias Gonçalves DGNET Network Solutions [EMAIL

IPFW+DUMMYNET UPLOAD PROBLEM

from ip 192.168.0.5 is: Down 123.66kbps Up 766.24kbps Which the problem? -- Daniel Dias Gonçalves DGNET Network Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] (37) 99824809 ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To

Re: IPFW+DUMMYNET UPLOAD PROBLEM

ny to any dst-ip 192.168.0.0/24 in # -- Daniel Dias Gonçalves DGNET Network Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] (37) 99824809 ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q

Load Balancing Outgoing, its possible ?

, -- Daniel Dias Gonçalves DGNET Network Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] (37) 99824809 ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Load Balancing Outgoing, its possible ?

Corey Smith escreveu: On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:19 +0200, G Bryant wrote: Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote: It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some software that I make this ? Zebra can help me? This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the

Nat Log

It is possible to record logs of all connections nated with the PF? Already tried to use "nat log on...", without success. Thanks. -- Daniel Dias Gonçalves DGNET Network Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dgnetwork.com.br/ +55 37-99824809 +55 3

PF NAT LOG

I need to record logs of all connections nated from PF, has some way? Thanks. -- Daniel Dias Gonçalves DGNET Network Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dgnetwork.com.br/ +55 37-99824809 +55 37-32421109 ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list