In article <9813e50b-c557-4fe1-badf-a2cffcbb8...@felyko.com>,
Rui Paulo wrote:
>On 4 Aug 2013, at 12:12, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like propose new BPF instructions for the misc category: BPF_COP
>> and BPF_COPX. It would provide a capability of calling an extern
In article <521f4522.5070...@netbsd.org>,
Darren Reed wrote:
>
>The current implementation of BPF makes it very hard to expand
>the instruction set without impinging on the ability to make
>future changes due to the way in which instructions are codified
>into 32bits. Whilst the method of support
