Hi :)
/etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_xl0="ether 00:11:11:11:11:11"
ifconfig_xl0="DHCP"
The above doesn't work..
I'm trying to set the mac, and then dhcp.. is this the correct way?
With this config, its not getting the mac assigned to xl0, so I have to
stop dhclient, run "ifconfig ether 00:11:11:11:11:11"
James Housley wrote:
The key was created /etc/start_if.xl0:
#!/bin/sh
Yep! Someone else also responded with a similar suggestion.
Thank you very much, everyone, problem solved.
I didn't know you could make start_if. ...very cool.
I also now know its in rc.conf(5)
:)
Hello..
I'm running ipf because I like it ...but now I need to use ipfw's pipe
feature. I was thinking that I could just run both, and keep all my
rules in ipf, then in ipfw: limit bandwidth for a few vlans, then allow all.
It didn't work (no rate-limiting happened).. and I'm thinking that ipf
Dinesh Nair wrote:
by default the flow is:
wire -> ipnat -> ipfilter -> ipfw -> kernel -> ipfilter -> ipnat ->ipfw
the patch in the above PR changes it to:
wire -> ipnat -> ipfilter -> ipfw -> kernel -> ipfw -> ipfilter -> ipnat
Interesting! Thanks for all the great info guys.
I don't really need t
mkay, I have to ask a possibly stupid question.
There's a recent bug where freebsd hangs with if_vlan.ko loaded when
using bpf. I'm being bitten by said bug.
BUT I have 'device vlan' in my kernel. Why is the module loading?!
rc.conf is the only thing I've modified, WRT vlan config:
dmz# grep vlan
Ok, I've got a v6 tunnel, and to make it work I had to "allow ipv6 from
" in ipfw. From what I understand, I have to make a completely
different set of rules for ipv6, and load them using the -6 flag.
Correct so far?
Ok, so I want to set up an ipip v4 tunnel to another box (that runs
ipf), and
Did something change from 5.2.1 to 5.3?
In 5.2.1 I used to have a config where the parent device, em(4), didn't have an
IP, and the vlan dev had the IP address. (yes, the parent device was "UP") I
then configured the trunk (on the switch) to have a native vlan of something
other than the vlan in
Jon Simola wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:01:52 -0800, Charlie Schluting
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now, in 5.3, the only thing I can get working is to configure the em0 int with
the IP, and set the trunk to have the native vlan corresponding to that IP.
Weird.
Sounds like you're not
Mike Wolman wrote:
I had major grief with the em driver and vlans,
i have found by tcpdumping on the em0 interface
actually causes more problems.
there are some more posts about this a couple of months ago,
my resolution was to swap the em card for an fxp instead as
the box was in production and i
On 1/20/2005 2:33 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Charlie Schluting wrote:
Now, in 5.3, the only thing I can get working is to configure the em0
int with the IP, and set the trunk to have the native vlan corresponding
to that IP. Weird.
Also, is there a way to stop em(4) from
On 1/20/2005 2:33 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
Try "ifconfig em0 -vlanhwtag" and see if that helps. If not, take a look
in if_em.c:em_setup_interface(), and you'll see two lines like this:
#if __FreeBSD_version >= 50
ifp->if_capabilities |= IFCAP_VLAN_HWTAGGING | IFCAP_VLAN_MTU;
hydros wrote:
The general question is how to combine the real IP addresses
and the private on the same physical interface.
Well, if you have a switch capable of vlans (and 802.1q trunks) you can
just run a trunk to the firewall, and have many interfaces.
My setup has one real IP, and 5 interna
Does anyone know of any statistics tools that do a good job summarizing
ALTQ queuing?
Perhaps with an rrd graph of some sort?
I just started using shaping, and its great.. but some time-based view of
the following data (or more) would be really interesting to see.
-Charlie
dmz# pfctl -s queue -
Hi,
So with tcpdump -e it somehow magically sees vlan tags.. even if
hardware stripping of the tags is enabled. How?
More importantly, I'm trying to figure out if a bpf read will see them
as well. Any insight on this?
TIA
-Charlie
___
freebsd-net@free
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Mar 9, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Charlie Schluting wrote:
More importantly, I'm trying to figure out if a bpf read will see them
as well. Any insight on this?
Yes, or it will if you use promisc mode and an appropriate BPF filter:
So promisc is enabled in my case.
This see
Charlie Schluting wrote:
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Mar 9, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Charlie Schluting wrote:
More importantly, I'm trying to figure out if a bpf read will see
them as well. Any insight on this?
Yes, or it will if you use promisc mode and an appropriate BPF filter:
So promisc is enabl
Kelly Yancey wrote:
You'll have a similar issue with BPF programs you write: you'll either
need to skip over the vlan tag header or not, depending on whether you
snagged the packet from the parent interface or the vlan interface.
Indeed. Thanks!
We skipped 12 bits ahead and everything is working
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, dima wrote:
ng_fec is the NetGraph module which implements Cisco FastEtherChannel
technology. This actually means you have 1 virtual interface fec0
representing 2 or more physical interfaces. The load balancing scheme
can be assigned by a Catalyst, bu
Olivier Nicole wrote:
? (10.0.0.1) at 00:e0:29:ad:5a:aa on em0 [ethernet]
will do the trick, but it is a bit too heavy for the purpose, I'd
prefer a solution that only send an ARP request.
If you just want to avoid the DNS lookup, you can use arp -an.
Its much faster :)
-Charlie
___
> it would be nice to have a feature like this, where you could have
> multiple same-prefix, same-metric routes in a FIB, and the packets would
> be balanced to the next hop, either on a per-flow or per-packet basis.
> i have seen a lot of answers to this request over the years along the
> lines of
20 matches
Mail list logo
