- Original message -
> sscanf() has a kernel version declared in kernel.h.
> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/lxr/source/include/linux/kernel.h#L196
>
> -- Saleh
You must have missed the name of this mailing list, it is freebsd-net not
linux-net.
--
This message has been scanned for viruse
On Saturday 19 July 2008 14:44:02 Adam Stylinski wrote:
> The controller definitely supports jumbo frames.
What proof do you have of this?
> I guess another question to ask would be if the newer kernel sources in
> freebsd-stable have support for jumbo frames on the MCP67 in the nfe
> driver.
No
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 17:50:04 Marius Strobl wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/128833; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?Aur=E9lien_M=E9r=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: kern/128833: [b
On Friday 05 December 2008 03:43:41 Randy Bush wrote:
> openbgp is said to be the best bsd implementation of bgp. but i see
> that ports/openbgpd has not been updated in a while. it is at 4.0 while
> 4.3 is the current public release.
Actually 4.4 is the latset release, although only available i
On Friday 05 December 2008 04:28:41 Randy Bush wrote:
> but no is-is? not to start an emacs/vi debate, but most of us old
> pharts are is-is, as are the big old backbones (and the smarter new
> ones:-).
Not yet. You're welcome to help start an isisd. ;)
So far BGP, OSPF, RIP and DVMRP working. O
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 15:24:52 Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Alexandre Vieira wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could install
> > hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed a light on what is the status of
> > this software implementation on 7.
On Thursday 17 January 2008 05:53:34 Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote:
> Michael MacLeod wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've got two DSL lines running to my house, and two WAN NIC's
> > installed in my FreeBSD router. I've been trying to get multilink ppp
> > working through my ISP (TekSavvy in Canada) f
On Sunday 02 March 2008 11:23:16 Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
> The 4 port card use 4x lanes.
There are also 6 port adapters which use 4x lanes.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
__
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:42:09AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Yuriy N. Shkandybin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have 2 freebsd servers connected by dedicated wire via em interfaces.
> > systems = 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 14 11:58:23 MSK 2006
> >
> > 1st)
> > man em sa
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:52:13PM +0100, OxY wrote:
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX )
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pertti Kosunen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Sten Daniel S?rsdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:18 PM
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:52:07PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:36:20PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
> > ECMP was indeed one of the features i was looking for at that time, which i
> > found to be impossible.
> > I just don't like the idea of moving towards anothe
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:51:44PM +0100, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
> > Heh. At first I read this and wasn't sure what ECMP was, I've never
> > seen anyone use that acronym before.
>
> Hmm, sorry if I used a non-common term there, it's the only abbreviation i
> know of ;>
I have always just used
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:56:24PM +, Baldur Gislason wrote:
> Following an unrelated discussion about "interface grouping" in OpenBSD,
> I'd like to know if there are any known or planned implementations of LACP
> (802.3ad)
> interface teaming in FreeBSD?
> FreeBSD currently has etherchannel
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 07:20:15PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 04:59:11PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:56:24PM +, Baldur Gislason wrote:
> > > Following an unrelated discussion about "interface grouping" in Ope
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:56:46PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> > He was not asking for ECMP. He clearly asked for a failover mechanism
> > for two switches within the SAME Layer *2* domain.
>
> Hrm ok I misread the original post, but I'm still not exactly sure what
> the original poster
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:49:34AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:51:05AM -0700, othermark wrote:
> > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, OxY wrote:
> > >
> > >> hi!
> > >>
> > >> my question is when will this chip being supported by 6.x?
> > >
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:18:51AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:01:06PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:49:34AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:51:05AM -0700, othermark wrote:
> > &
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:36:17AM -0700, Paul Saab wrote:
> Brad wrote:
> >
> >Source exists for newer Broadcom Gig chips (575x and derivatives) yet
> >there is no documentation available for that either.
> >
> >
> Documentation does exist, just not publica
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 07:49:07PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a bge card, that's identified as:
>
> bge0: mem
> 0xfe8f-0xfe8f irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2
>
> According to
> http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12131_div/12131_div.HTML,
> the BCM5751 su
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 08:05:47PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> ?'?? 09 ??? 2006 19:57, Brad ???:
> > There is a mistake on that web-page. None of Broadcom's PCI Express
> > chipsets support Jumbo frames.
>
> Indeed. Our bge(4) manual page says:
>
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:20:02AM +1000, Antony Mawer wrote:
> On 23/09/2006 4:47 AM, Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
> >?zkan KIRIK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Thanks for your reply,
> >>
> >>It seems that HP ProCurve 5400 series doesn't support fec trunking :
> >>
> >>hp(config)# trunk A3-a5 trk1 f
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:27:58 +0800
"speedo chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> Below links show that
>
> *IPFilter* has been updated from 3.4.35 to 4.1.18. On
> FreeBSD6.0 *IPFilter* has been updated from 4.1.8 to 4.1.13. On
> FreeBSD6.2
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/
The following reply was made to PR kern/147824; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Brad Degnan
To: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/147824: [msk]: watchdog timeouts
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:57:03 -0700
On 8/17/2010 11:29 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote
ny
consideration at all.
But maybe that's just me.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the
e heard that they've
been pretty successful at building servers to compete pretty well on
price with Dell, while also providing much better customer service,
including custom-building servers to your precise requirements.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give
FBSD |
| 10.0.1.1 |
|
|
< PC net on 10.0.1.0 >
Will this work, or will the DSL router's NAT break IPsec? Also, are there
problems with traffic to/from the Internet? Should I NAT that, or just use a
255.255.0.0 mask?
T
Hello,
I'm having quite the time trying to set up a IPsec tunnel on 4.3-RELEASE.
Host-to-host IPsec works fine - I can make connections all day long between my
two gateways. But for the life of me, I can't get my windows boxen on each end
to talk to the other. I've got identical psk.txt files
tell me if I will run into any problems running NAT on my gateways?
Thanks,
Brad
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Shoichi Sakane wrote:
> > I'm having quite the time trying to set up a IPsec tunnel on 4.3-RELEASE.
> > Host-to-host IPsec works fine - I can make connections all day l
Soichi,
As it turns out, NAT works fine. Thanks for all your help.
-Brad
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Shoichi Sakane wrote:
> > Can you tell me if I will run into any problems running NAT on my gateways?
>
> I have never used NAT with IPSec. You should tell this mailing list yo
Hello,
I was wondering if there was a way that I could monitor the bandwidth usage
live? I have heard of a linux program called iptraf, is there something
similar to that for FreeBSD?
Thank You,
Brad Davis
_
Send and receive
I'm having trouble configuring mpd 3.15,
Im trying to create a vpn tunnel to a friends network throguh the internet who is
using windows 2003 at the moment but will be using freebsd and mpd as well.
the vpn will allow incomming connections but not outgoing.
i will attach the configuration files be
und with
crap like zebra or quagga.
Oh, and it would be nice if someone somewhere started thinking
about a mesh routing implementation for *BSD, either AODV or
something else.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporar
es resiliency the way it should. If
this problem isn't already addressed by bgpd, I'm sure it will be
before Henning can go production with using this for his core routers
at his ISP.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain
er. Thank you very much.
Show me the words from Henning himself where I have
mis-represented his views on zebra/quagga, and I will gladly
apologize in public.
Until then, I stand by what I have said.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obta
eeds to be redundant. Not much you can in bgpd.
Not in bgpd per se, no. But by then you'd have added more
protocol support to the daemon and that name would no longer be
appropriate.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
-- such as bgpd from OpenBSD.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSH
pursue. I'd rather start with something
that requires less re-work, and would presumably allow us to more
easily add in any additional bits that we feel are necessary or
desirable.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a lit
asher-size four-processor Intel OEM fileserver-to-be, an ancient
SPARC-4 clone, and an ancient Pentium-133 laptop w/ 48MB of RAM),
then I'll be glad to do what I can to help.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
ful?
I'm just wondering if there aren't a lot of people who could
benefit from something like this, only they don't know it. If they
were to find out, it might help provide funding and other resources
to spur development.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They that
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if the Yukon 2 NIC chipset is currently supported by
FreeBSD (under any revision) ?
Thanks,
Brad
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail
:-(
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brad du Plessis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 06 June 2006 09:40
Subject: Re: Yukon 2 NIC chipset support
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Brad du Plessis
Hi,
I've looked high and low and the only USB ISDN TA's I've found that work under
BSD are the 3Com ISDN Pro TA's. All the others I've tried are software TA's
and don't work.
Could someone please give me advice on what will work under BSD, I've run
Where can I get a list of USB modems supported by BSD
Thanks
Brad
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
How do I find out before I go and buy a usb modem that its going to be
detected as a umodem or a ugen device. I assume when its detected as a ugen
then the modem is some type of usb winmodem and its not going to work under
bsd. Are usb modems with CAPI support always winmodems?
Thanks
Brad
across this before, is this a bug in the kernel? (I assume it
does the same thing in FreeBSD)
Any help would be most appreciated!
Thanks,
Brad
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 11/26/2020 5:44 AM, Tom Marcoen wrote:
Hey Meka
You say DHCPD (which to me means the DHCP daemon) but you also mention
"DHCP client"?
I assume the software can be one or the other but not both. Which of
the two do you
mean?
Or is there something I am missing?
That's not what he said. Rea
46 matches
Mail list logo
