use.
Thats the complete 10.x.x.x, 17.16.x.x to 17.31.255.255 and
192.168.x.x.
Using addresses outside the private address space can mislead you
when routers take the date elsewhere.
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail
operly responding to auto-negotiation as documented. When
auto-neg fails at least one side will go to half-duplex, and with
the other in fdx then you usually only see throughput of
about 10% of normal because of data being sent back on a line that
the fdx line thinks is clear to send upon.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
plete
details on this - so it could be in the rumor category.
My gut feeling is that it is something Apple is doing not FreeBSD -
or we'd have heard a lot more about this.
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing lis
back via
> fxp2
> and the only way I can do that is by using the 'fwd' command.
...
You didn't indicate the model of Cicso's but I've used both
NAT and PAT in Cisco routers.
I'm wondering if you did the NATing in the routers if this wouldn't
help?
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
wn working nameservers in your /etc/resolv.conf
and then perform a 'chflags' to make that file read only, and then
nothing will change it until you reset the flags.
You problem Is not a BSD problem.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
f
tem to use those name servers it's not
going to use them. I don't recall if the OP mentioned the OS
version he was using in the original post.
BIll
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
oroners Toolkit - will display.
'lazurus' causes files to rise from the dead. Used ahead of
time you can run MD5 on the entire system so you can check
everything if you beleive you've been broken into.
Dan Farmer and Wietse Venema wrote it.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:07:45AM -0500, Bill Vermillion thus spoke:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:24:15AM -0500, Mike Nowlin thus spoke:
Damn - been one of those days. I looked at the sources to get
Wietse's name spelled right, and copied out the source address but
negelected to incl
>
> Thank's
>
> P.S. Sorry for my bAd english
>
Do you have log_in_vain="YES" in your rc.conf. That what it
looks like at first glance to me.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
concerns me. The permission on the /tftpboot directory
must be world readable as well as the file.
We also need to be sure of his inetd.conf file to see that
the /tftpboot is the directory specified. We aren't even sure
if that is enabled are we?
Just some thoughts.
Bill
--
Bill Vermil
gt;
> what's wrong with the command?
> route add -inet6 bla.bla.bla::/48 -iface xl0
>From faithd(8)
# route add -inet6 3ffe:501:4819::: -prefixlen 96 ::1
Don't know if that helps or not.
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
ges to less than 1 second.
Your message is the exact message documented in init(8)
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
's just a small step on the
way, to locking down a system, but just changing login names won't
do it.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:20:02PM -0700, Orville R. Weyrich.Jr thus sprach:
> Speaking of SSH, are there any recommended SSH clients for Windows 95?
Putty. Don't recall where I got it though. It's free
>
> orville.
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Bill Vermillion wrote:
>
27;m curious as to why you'd want/need an alternate root account.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
me DSLAM, etcetera.
BTW - my link at 512K qualifies for 3MB but that costs more, priced
by speed, but the one at the office [that I telneted to and then
timed going out] is running about 1MB, and the only thing
guaranteed is something below 512 - perhaps 380 - but the closer
you are the faster
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:02:22AM -0400, Bryan Fullerton thus sprach:
> At 12:43 AM -0400 7/3/01, Bill Vermillion wrote:
> >The only way to be sure it is OS related [and I suspect it is not]
> >is to take your machine to their location. DSL can vary in speed
> >from locati
2.168.1.2 to 192.168.2.255, the packets are dropped to the
> floor. IMO, this is wrong...
But the question now is - what is the netmask on these interfaces.?
That will make a difference.
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
To Unsubscribe: send
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:30:56PM -0400, Jonathan Chen thus sprach:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:23:52PM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:36:38AM -0400, Jonathan Chen thus sprach:
> >
> > > On FreeBSD -CURRENT and -STABLE, packets to broadcas
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 11:07:48AM -0800, George V. Neville-Neil thus spoke:
> Just checking out some developer info on OS/X and I came upon this
> interesting quote:
> For kernel developers, Darwin provides the Network Kernel
> Extension (NKE) facility. This allows developers to create
>
l
While it is targeted to the Cicso switches the same advice applies
to most things.
I'm not saying this IS the problem you are having but since it is
on the same HW with two OSes this needs to be verfied.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
.3.4 (1.2.3.4) at (incomplete) on vlan1 permanent [vlan]
>
> In result of it's permanent entry, kernel doesn't listening for
> arp-replies for this host.
>
> My question is simple: is it bug or feature?
You left out 'user error'.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion -
Some places won't accept my mail as even though
I"m on a STATIC IP and have been the same one for 3 years, they
consider all DSL lines as spam sources. So depending on end
destination I send some to my providers transport, and others off
to anothe
things for users that dont
exist.
I just use the @my.domain.name nouser
And in /etc/aliases I have 'nouser' aliased to /dev/null
Bill
> NASH!
>
> -ty
>
> Bill Vermillion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The door open and in walked
> trouble - disguised as
. Before we added a PRI and a Livingston we were
thinking about using the MT's in the 19" rack mount box they have.
And when performing fax from email - using sendmail incoming and
routing to fax [in the early days of the current 'net before many
people
ed be somewhere in the link don't
discount the fact that the problem could be much closer. Have you
tried a traceroute to see if it is at one particular link.
If your provider does not block it you might try the -R option
to ping the site to help pinpoint the source of the
iddle and the private
network is fully protected.
I have no financial interest in them, but I have know Paul for
ages.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
then go to a slow
green blink as it starts up, then go to a faster blink, and then
when it is steady you have a working DSL connection.
This really should probably go to freebsd-questions as from my POV
it's not a 'net' problem.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
__
I don't know if using the 'mediopt' argument will shut down the
entire connection - but you probably are going to have to try.
If it works from the commnand line be sure to add it to the startup
script so it gets fixed on a reboot.
It
anently. It was the vibration in shipment that
temporarily fixed things - but shipping an item out wasn't what I
call a good fix :-)
> So I am thinking the problem may be with the co-location operation.
As above - it could be the colo - or it could be your network
connections to the colo.
FreeBSD machine and trace back to your client IP -
or as close as you can get. That may mean just to the edge of your
current provider but that may give you some idea.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.or
kmaster.ca.
I can't traceroute to it as it stops resonding at 64.114.45.106, so
I'd say they are blocking things at that point - which isn't
helping at all :-( o
However the site comes up very fast.
Bill
> --
> Stephan Wehner
> >http://stephan.sugarmotor.or
omains hosted on the
> server use a.a.a.b and a.a.a.c!
> So basically I can't figure out what's up as .d works fine..anyone able to
> help me with some suggestions of where to look for fixing .b and .c?
You showed up your rc.conf.
What might be more helpful is the o
and take new zones in charge even if this serial is "not good" ?
The other poster pointed out that your error is in lines 12, 13,
and 15 of zone/lamddomain.com
I've always used 'nslint' - in the ports tree - to check everything
after I make any changes.
to get them to fix it.
The last official update at IANA shows June 18 of this year, and
it is still spelled bakcup.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ne
#x27;s signature mark. ;) If you know you'll always use
> 100BT/FD, it wouldn't hurt to have your ISP set the port to
> that as well (just to be safe).
A good reference to all the negotiation problems with Cisco
can be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html
>
r TrustedUser.
In /etc/rc.conf try this.
sendmail_submit_enable="YES"for local use or
sendmail_submit_outbound="YES"
For best results tryman 8 rc.sendmail.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing l
gs noschg /etc/resolv.conf.
See man chflags for further information.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
d is true.
> Anyone have any clues on this bizarre problem?
No.
But I'm going to see if I can trace down what I have heard, that
may only be rumors.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
a very large flash file on their front page. I've also heard
annecdotal reports of slow G4 to MS machines too.
But not everyone has this and I can't seem to find an answer.
And I have NO problems with pings. Just data transfer.
One G4 runs high load as shown under very little CPU avail
; doesn't work.
> What do you recommend as configuration settings?
> I seem to get stuck.
Is the order in you /etc/host.conf file set to
hosts
bind
Are the names in you /etc/hosts file correct.
IP first then FQDN followed by short name.
You didn't
s is a level 3 switch
and it can be turned into router only or router/switch.
$400. Not being a name-brand that small business equate like they
do Cisco the used prices are just a fraction of the comparable
Cisco product.
I see similar one for $495 =buy-now= and th
42 matches
Mail list logo
