phabricator).
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22012
https://github.com/NetworkConfiguration/dhcpcd
Regards,
Ben
--
From: Ben Woods
woods...@freebsd.org
ck on your experience.
Also, would be keen to hear some of the perks of dhclient and rtsold - is it
existing integration into your downstream management layer? (Not meant
sarcastically).
Cheers,
Ben
--
From: Ben Woods
woods...@freebsd.org
However,
>> thinking about the import and the improvement of boot-time
>> configuration together does not make good sense to me to judge the
>> reasonableness of the import.
>
> I agree with all of this.
>
> I would only ask that there is the ability to just enable dhcpcd as a generic
> service in rc.conf as dhcpcd_enabled=YES so that people can play with it as
> intended and not affect any existing configuration.
>
> Roy
I agree with the plan also - Import dhcpcd with its dedicated rc.d script
(build enabled with runtime off by default, but manually enabled by
dhcpcd_enable=“YES”).
No need to change the rc or network.subr system for now, as dhclient and rtsold
are already off by default (or if enabled by default will be possible to
disable in rc.conf).
No need to have plans to remove dhclient/rtsold now - let’s give people the
option for now, with no plan to necessarily remove dhclient/rtsold.
Hiroki - I’ll update my phabricator review to align with the above.
Regards,
Ben
--
From: Ben Woods
woods...@freebsd.org
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022, at 8:46 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
>
> I agree with the plan also - Import dhcpcd with its dedicated rc.d
> script (build enabled with runtime off by default, but manually enabled
> by dhcpcd_enable=“YES”).
>
> No need to change the rc or network.subr system fo
In the FreeBSD forum post below, I explain having difficulty reading the
output of netstat -ibnhW. In short, I am trying to determine the network
usage from a network interface, but the one interface is listed once for
each subnet on the NIC.
http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=48226
The
Hi everyone,
I am wondering what it would take to add support for RTL8153 to the
rue(4) USB to Fast Ethernet driver for Realtek.
I bought one of these from NEC in Japan (their part number
PC-VP-BK06), as shown here (use Google translate):
http://121ware.com/product/option/cable/pc-vp-bk06/index.h
On 3 June 2015 at 22:59, Ben Woods wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am wondering what it would take to add support for RTL8153 to the
> rue(4) USB to Fast Ethernet driver for Realtek.
>
> I bought one of these from NEC in Japan (their part number
> PC-VP-BK06), as shown here
On 3 June 2015 at 23:18, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 06/03/15 17:01, Ben Woods wrote:
>>
>> On 3 June 2015 at 22:59, Ben Woods wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I am wondering what it would take to add support for RTL8153 to the
>>&g
On 3 June 2015 at 23:46, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 06/03/15 17:42, Ben Woods wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for your help HPS! How can we make this work out of the box
>> in the future?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In dev/usb/quirk/usb_quirk.c you can add a quirk that co
On Monday, July 20, 2015, arthurwang wrote:
>
>
> Excuse Me , but this is the first time I used I mailing list to have
> discussions with others , could anyone help me how to subscribe this ,
> and how to get the historical mails ?
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for helping a newbee ~!!
>
Go to https
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> $ sockstat -l | fgrep 631
> ?? ? ? tcp4 127.0.0.1:631 *:*
>
> $ nc -l 127.0.0.1 631
> nc: Address already in use
>
I'm more curious as to why sockstat gives you question marks instead of the
proper process deta
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 2:25 am, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> wrote
> in <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com>:
>
> dr> Has anyone ever thought or considered integrating an IPv6 DHCP client
> in
> dr> base?
>
> I have a plan to import wide-dhcp6 into the base system because it is
> simple enoug
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 8:53 am, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 2:25 am, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
>> wrote
>> in <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com>:
>>
>> dr> Has anyone ever thought or considered integrating an IPv6 DHCP client
>> i
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 08:32, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 8:53 am, Ben Woods wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 2:25 am, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>>
>>> wrote
>>> in <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> d
On 1 December 2015 at 06:48, Nathan Aherne wrote
> Thank you for helping me to understand vimage better Julian! I have read
> all three links you posted a number of times.
>
> I use iocage for jail management and it uses epair. From your comments it
> seems you recommend netgraph?
>
> This is the
On Thursday, 24 December 2015, Yongmin Cho wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I have checked tcp keep-alive in freebsd head.
> According to RFC7323, tcp timestamp option must be sent with
> keep-alive packet after timestamp option has been negotiated.
> So I have tested this on linux-3.13.0.
> tcp keep-alive
Hey everyone,
I was recently trying to set up PPPoE to my ISP, over my network interface
which is configured with 802.1q VLAN tagging using vlan(4).
I utilised the vlans_= feature described in rc.conf(5),
which creates a cloned interface named ..
In /etc/ppp.conf I used the syntax PPPoE:. and th
On 16 January 2016 at 09:09, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 21:36:15 +0100
> Guido Falsi wrote:
>
> GF> From your description it looks like a different issue. Looks like
> GF> some network issue, maybe some network device (switch or router) is
> GF> eating up certain multicasts?
>
> Th
Hey everyone,
I am trying to set up multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current, so I can
pass IPTV from my ISP to my set top box via my FreeBSD router. I intend to
use net/igmpproxy as per this forum post:
https://lafibre.info/remplacer-livebox/remplacer-sa-livebox-par-un-routeur-pfsense/
I am runni
On Saturday, 23 January 2016, Ben Woods wrote:
>
> I am running the GENERIC kernel, except with VIMAGE enabled and SCTP
> disabled.
>
> When I try to load the kernel module, I am getting an error:
> % sudo kldload -v ip_mroute
> kldload: an error occurred while loading the
On 24 January 2016 at 11:36, Otacílio wrote:
> Em 24/01/2016 07:24, Olivier Cochard-Labbé escreveu:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Could someone running FreeBSD current on a test machine try loading
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016, Michael McConville wrote:
> I sent this a few weeks ago, but it never got applied:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=freebsd-net&m=145392057613453&w=2
>
> Here's my explanation for the same fix in OpenBSD:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=145377854103866&w=2
>
> Thanks fo
On Monday, 30 May 2016, Yuri > wrote:
> There is vnstat that does this by interface.
>
> But is there a way to do this by the application? This is because nearly
> every packet that is sent through the system is sent on behalf of some
> process running on the system.
>
> It would be nice to be abl
On Saturday, 10 September 2016, Yuri wrote:
> I observe this weird fenomenon: scanimage (from graphics/sane-backends)
> freezes the system when it doesn't find a scanner on the LAN, and works
> fine when the scanner is found.
>
> The only thing that scanimage does is sending UDP broadcasts, this
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 8:43 pm, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Long story short: if you try to aggregate tap(4) devices into lacp-based
> lagg(4), aggregate will fail to negotiate lacp with remote end and will not
> be able to pass traffic.
>
> Root cause: lacp code requires underlying int
Morning!
Since my recent update from FreeBSD12-current r313908 to r315466, I have
noticed some strange behaviour with one of my network interfaces.
The interface seems to work fine for a day or so, but on a number of
occasions I have found it to be down, and constantly outputting the
following me
On 27 March 2017 at 15:35, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> Try turning TSO off.. i.e. ifconfig igb3 -tso or sysctl net.inet.tcp.tso=0
>
> The transition to iflib has exposed much jankiness in the Intel "shared
> code" of the e1000 drivers. In particular, the locking contracts may not
> align with FreeBSD
On 2 April 2017 at 16:04, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> Sean Bruno committed a couple fixes to the watchdog code this week that
> should at least allow for a usable TSO although the frequency of the
> watchdog events is still cause for concern. It seems some timeouts are
> part of Intel's expectations
>
> Ben:
>
> What kind of workload is this machine processing? I'd like to try and
> duplicate this failure if possible.
>
> sean
>
>
Hi Sean,
It is a Netgate RCC-VE-8860 running as my home firewall.
https://netgate.com/docs/rcc-ve-8860/quick-start-guide.html
I am running FreeBSD 12-current r315
Hi everyone,
I have noticed my networking statistics appear to be double counting on two
of my FreeBSD 12-CURRENT boxes running r319025. Could someone please help
me to find the problem (I believe it is likely to be a bug in the
networking driver).
I discovered the double counting by comparing th
On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 1:45 am, Brooks Davis wrote:
> DHCP is one of the most exposed attack surfaces in existence. We expect
> it to take input from explicitly untrustworthy networks and perform
> actions as root. It might be OK to import this as a stopgap only
> supporting IPv6, but without c
On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 3:42 am, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> I do not have a strong objection on dhcpcd (I am using it on some of
> my FreeBSD boxes actually) but let me explain the reason why I chose
> wide-dhcp as the candidate. That is because it is a small,
> functional DHCPv6-only implementation
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 3:34 am, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> How do you want to proceed the discussion? I sent my view and made
> myself clear that importing dhcpcd into the base system as-is is not
> a good idea. What is your answer to my concerns? I also agree with
> Brooks about a need for sandb
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 9:00 pm, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote
> in :
> ro> Sorry if it was not clear. The discussion involves what is the
> ro> required acceptance for Priviledge Seperation because this is quite
> ro> new to me.
> ro>
> ro> My current idea is to open DHCP, IPv6RA and
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 09:40, Roy Marples wrote:
> On 28/11/2019 22:50, Ben Woods wrote:
> > It is not yet enabled by default until he gets more feedback from others
> > that it is working ok. I intend to update the FreeBSD port to enable
> > this feature (perhaps with a “-
35 matches
Mail list logo
