ute the subsequent return statement.
Is this intentional? (i.e. dead code awaiting future development?), or a bug?
Or I am going blind to something obvious?
Thanx Barry Spinney.
(p.s. I doubt it matters which version of code, but to be precise this is from
the
/pub/FreeBSD/development/tarbal
Thanx Barry.
(p.s. the reason I am curious is I have been doing some work with a tcp stack
that
was original derived from some FreeBSD software, though with non-trivial
changes,
and I have been trying to understand its workings).
-Original Message-
From: Mark Johnston [mailto:mark
