No Subject

2001-06-26 Thread Andriy Korud
unsubscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Large scale NAT problems

2003-12-16 Thread Andriy Korud
And worse thing is that Linux on Cel/800 with SOHO cards do that NATing with 5% CPU load without any problem :-(. Maybe I shoud try natd? May this help? Any suggestions? thanks in advance, Andriy Korud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: Large scale NAT problems

2003-12-16 Thread Andriy Korud
Цитую Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Andriy Korud wrote: > > The problem is that when traffic grows to 10Mbit and number of active NAT > > sessions reach 7, CPU usage exponentialy grows and system spends all > CPU > > time in interrupts handling. &g

Re: Large scale NAT problems

2003-12-16 Thread Andriy Korud
Цитую Q <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You have set the 'sysctl kern.polling.enable=1' bit right? > > Seeya...Q > Yes, and I 'systat -v 1' show 2000 timer interrupts and 0 em0, Andriy ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Large scale NAT problems

2003-12-16 Thread Andriy Korud
Цитую DrumFire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:40:11 +0200 > Andriy Korud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First of try OpenBSD pf, that works only on a 5.x-Release, > try to disable device polling in your kernel configuration. > > I've made

Poor network/forwarding performance

2004-01-12 Thread Andriy Korud
nd check? Best regards, Andriy Korud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

NATD and available ports

2004-01-12 Thread Andriy Korud
t map smaller blocks of private IP's into certain public IP, but have no idea how can I do this using natd. Any suggestions? Regards, Andriy Korud. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsu

Which one ip_nat.h?

2004-01-23 Thread Andriy Korud
Hi, I need to define LARGE_NAT in ip_nat.h, however there are 3 such files in my system: locate ip_nat.h /usr/include/netinet/ip_nat.h /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter/ip_nat.h /usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.h The question is simple - which one should I change? regards, Andriy Korud

Large scale NAT - problem resolved

2004-01-28 Thread Andriy Korud
r you help, Andriy Korud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Large scale NAT - problem resolved

2004-01-28 Thread Andriy Korud
ine in _proper_ :-) ip_nat.h: #define LARGE_NAT #define NAT_SIZE 80809 #define RDR_SIZE 80809 #define NAT_TABLE_SZ 262143 #define HOSTMAP_SIZE 32767 don't ask me from where I've taken those number - mostly they was found in mailing lists. regards, Andriy Korud

Changing TOS of forwarded packets?

2004-02-03 Thread Andriy Korud
Hi, my question is simple - is it possible to set TOS value of forwarded packets using ipfw, ipfilter or other magic on FreeBSD 4-STABLE? Tnanks in advance, Andriy Korud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Changing TOS of forwarded packets?

2004-02-03 Thread Andriy Korud
Thanks, but I'm looking for some solution that'd allow me to modify TOS of the packets that match some filter rule, so I think I have to modify ipfilter code. Andriy > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:46:18PM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote: > > Hello, > > > Hi, my question i

Re: Changing TOS of forwarded packets?

2004-02-03 Thread Andriy Korud
Цитую Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > check out the "tcpmssd" port. > > it changes soem tcp parameters during forwarding.. > you could modify it to do what you want I am sure.. > > Thanks, but I think at the packet rate I'm interested in (~30Mbit/s and more) divert solution will have poo

Re: Changing TOS of forwarded packets?

2004-02-04 Thread Andriy Korud
Cytowanie Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:29:24PM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote: > > Thanks, but I'm looking for some solution that'd allow me to modify TOS of > the > > packets that match some filter rule, so I think I have to modif