Hello!
On a multihomed FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE, in a multihomed jail, source IP
selection suddenly refused to work.
ifconfig on a box:
bce0: flags=8943 metric
0 mtu 1500
options=c01bb
ether 00:1a:64:c5:d0:c8
inet 192.168.80.40 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.80.255
media:
Hello!
I've run into strange problem: in non-promisc mode, two freevrrpds does
not seems to see each others multicasts.
Is it a bug or a feature?
Alex.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
03.03.2011 0:48, Bjoern A. Zeeb пишет:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
On a multihomed FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE, in a multihomed jail, source IP
selection suddenly refused to work.
ifconfig on a box:
Seems reasonable, yes?
Pinging from the box
# ping 192.168.75.59
On 03/03/11 15:03, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Not sure what you expect. Your jail has an address out of
192.168.82.2/24 and
192.168.75.2/24
You are trying to connect to neither of those networks but 192.168.72.3.
Now it was a typo. Either I've lost my mind or I can't reproduce a
problem. Will ch
Hello!
I'm trying to set up a box as round-robin TCP proxy. Of course, I'm
trying to do everything on kernel-level.
This simple setup
rdr on sk0 proto tcp from any to any port = smtp -> port 25
round-robin
should work. At least, I thought so.
However, attempt to connect to port 25 yielde
Hello!
I'm trying to set up a box as round-robin TCP proxy. Of course, I'm
trying to do everything on kernel-level.
This simple setup
rdr on sk0 proto tcp from any to any port = smtp -> port 25
round-robin
should work. At least, I thought so.
However, attempt to connect to port 25 yielde
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:11, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to set up a box as round-robin TCP proxy. Of course, I'm
trying to do everything on kernel-level.
This simple setup
rdr on sk0 proto tcp from any to any port = smtp -> port 25
round-
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:11, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to set up a box as round-robin TCP proxy. Of course, I'm
trying to do everything on kernel-level.
This simple setup
rdr on sk0 proto tcp from any to any port = smtp -> port 25
round-
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:11, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to set up a box as round-robin TCP proxy. Of course, I'm
trying to do everything on kernel-level.
This simple setup
rdr on sk0 proto tcp from any to any port = smtp -> port 25
round-
Hello!
I'm trying to use ASUS WL-167g, with ural driver compiled into kernel,
but system does not recognize it.
from /var/log/messages
May 12 23:47:15 tarkhil kernel: ugen1: Ralink 802.11 bg WLAN, rev
2.00/0.01, addr 2
from usbdevs -v
port 5 addr 2: high speed, power 300 mA, config 1, 80
Volker wrote:
On 05/12/07 21:55, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to use ASUS WL-167g, with ural driver compiled into kernel,
but system does not recognize it.
from /var/log/messages
May 12 23:47:15 tarkhil kernel: ugen1: Ralink 802.11 bg WLAN, rev
2.00/0.01, addr 2
from us
Hello!
I'm trying to use mpd 5.1, on FreeBSD 6.2, and got some really strange
problems.
1. NAT.
[10:37] services-new:/<2>etc/mpd5 # grep nat /usr/local/etc/mpd5/mpd.conf
set nat address 81.195.122.86
set iface enable nat
in web interface, option for interface includes "nat enab
Hello!
I'm trying to find out how to set up altq in 5.2.1-release and simply cannot
understand where to start from.
There is an rc.d script, and node for altq; but nothing more, no docs, no daemons. On
altq page, the latest release is about stoneage time.
Is it dead? Or I'm just cannot find t
Hello!
I've read man ipfw several times but still did not catch the following thing:
I want to make ssh traffic 'top priority', giving it all bandwidth it wants, without
explicitly limiting other kinds of traffic.
man ipfw is quite unclear on queue usage, can anyone give me a working example?
Hello!
I'm using FreeBSD (5.3-RELEASE-p5) as internet access server, and I have
to NAT GRE packets. I'm using pf.
The problem is that SOMETIMES PF fails to create proper rule using nat,
while binat works fine.
Not only I do not want to expose Windows boxes (even if those addresses
are fire
compunction wrote:
GRE needs to pass bidirectional. You will need a binat to make it
work. I have not found a firewall that will allow GRE to work with a
many to one nat.
The most painful thing is that pf's nat works for GRE - SOMETIMES :-(
The only thing firewall needs to implement for
compunction wrote:
GRE needs to pass bidirectional. You will need a binat to make it
work. I have not found a firewall that will allow GRE to work with a
many to one nat.
The most painful thing is that pf's nat works for GRE - SOMETIMES :-(
The only thing firewall needs to implement for
Giovanni P. Tirloni wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
compunction wrote:
GRE needs to pass bidirectional. You will need a binat to make it
work. I have not found a firewall that will allow GRE to work with a
many to one nat.
The most painful thing is that pf's nat works fo
Hello
Is SO_BINDANY supported in FreeBSD 10.3? If not, do any patches exists?
Alex
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
.ipfw/L8lzLmG05WE
... poke me to write up some documentation. :)
-adrian
On 12 August 2016 at 08:29, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/08/2016 8:00 PM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello
Is SO_BINDANY supported in FreeBSD 10.3? If not, do any patches exists?
I'm certain that it is, somehow, but I'll
Hello!
I'm trying to set up FreeBSD-based router, and got troubles with
bandwidth limiting. My queues drops lots of packets.
[23:38] gw:~ # ipfw pipe 200 config bw 30mbit/s queue 100
[23:42] gw:~ # ipfw add 600 pipe 200 ip from any to any out via vlan333
00600 pipe 200 ip from any to any out v
Tobias P. Santos wrote:
Hello!
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to set up FreeBSD-based router, and got troubles with
bandwidth limiting. My queues drops lots of packets.
[23:38] gw:~ # ipfw pipe 200 config bw 30mbit/s queue 100
You should use 30Mbit/s (with capital M).
Hello!
for about 4-5 days, I'm expeirencing heavy troubles with my VPN (mpd)
6.1-RELEASE based server.
After some time (minimum 2 seconds, maximum 12 hours) of running MPD
with moderate load (about 100-200 clients, CPU not overused), system
locks (even keyboard hangs) to reset. Nothing at al
Hello!
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to reset.
Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a hardware problem.
I'm updating to 6.2 now, but have little hope. What can I turn on in
kernel to fix it or at least to make computer reboot?
Alex.
___
Richard Tector wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to
reset. Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a
hardware problem.
I'm updating to 6.2 now, but have little hope. What can I turn on in
kernel to fix
Richard Tector wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Richard Tector wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to
reset. Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a
hardware problem.
Which version of mpd are you using? Have you tried
Max Laier wrote:
[ Removing -stable from CC ]
On Monday 19 February 2007 15:57, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to
reset. Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a hardware
problem.
I'm updating to 6.2 now, but have l
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Alex Povolotsky пишет:
mpd (fresh) on FreeBSD 6.1p12 sometimes hangs system, totally, to
reset. Tried two completely different boxes, so it cannot be a
hardware problem.
It's easy to reproduce? Can you try make debug-friendly kernel?
RELATIVELY easy. It happens
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 11:35 AM 2/20/2007, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Thanks a lot, I've added invariants and witness; if it won't yield
any information, I'll try more.
So far, this cursed thing is working with some load for 2 hours,
that's much. It does NOT, surely NOT try
Hello!
Is there anybody here who can say "I'm running mpd with 400 pptp
connections, and it works without a flaw"?
I mean 400 ACTIVE connections.
If yes, I'll ask lots of questions. If no, I'll have to look for other
pptp server. Cannot afford CISCO right now.
Alex.
__
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Is there anybody here who can say "I'm running mpd with 400 pptp
connections, and it works without a flaw"?
I am running >100 mpd servers, and they work without a flaw.
I mean 400 ACTIVE connections.
And I have >10k PPPoE
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hmm... May I ask you to show your dmesg, kernel config and mpd
configs? I have heard several rumors about system lockup with mpd.
I have heard only one and that person answered me that problem was
solved by avoiding of routing loop, when tunnel
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
And, again, please show me your mpd.conf
Attached.
Thanks a lot; watchdog is armed, WITNESS and INVARIANTS on, running...
Alex.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
And, again, please show me your mpd.conf
Attached.
Thanks, it seems to be more or less stable; however, throughput is quite
little, lots of packets lost and "No buffer space available" on attempt
to ping VPN addresses (only VPN i
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Thanks, it seems to be more or less stable; however, throughput is
quite little, lots of packets lost and "No buffer space available" on
attempt to ping VPN addresses (only VPN is affected).
Have you tried to disable PPTP windowing in
Hello!
Thanks to all who helped, I'm progressing.
The box seems to be unstable, however, it reboots with watchdog, not freeze.
After boot, I'm getting a message
Feb 22 20:58:12 gw kernel: Memory modified after free 0xc4524000(2048)
val=a028c0de @ 0xc4524000
Feb 22 20:58:12 gw kernel: Memory m
Alexander Motin wrote:
To somehow limit searching area, I think you should try to disable all
possible additional functions like netflow, tee, DialOnDemand,
tcpmssfix, nat, vjcomp, compression, encryption and everything else
you have and can disable for some time without harm.
No netflow, no
Alexander Motin wrote:
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
After disabling windowing and setting net.graph's, mpd4 refuses to work
and no ng interfaces ever created
lowering both tunables to 128000 solved the problem, will look more.
Oops! I have missed
kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=1048576
, which is req
Hello!
Does anyone have any positive experience with Intel WiFi adapter on
Lenovo R60 with FreeBSD 6.X?
Native driver or ndis, does not matter.
Alex.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
Max Laier wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 07:38, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Does anyone have any positive experience with Intel WiFi adapter on
Lenovo R60 with FreeBSD 6.X?
That would be the 3945abg part, right? In that case you want the driver
from here: http://www.clearchain.com/wiki
40 matches
Mail list logo
