Re: per-FIB socket binding

2024-12-23 Thread Santiago Martinez
Hi, here’s another user of fibs. Each of our servers have multiple fibs and jails with fibs. I like the proposed. Santi > On 23 Dec 2024, at 16:46, Paul Vixie wrote: > >  > On Monday, December 23, 2024 7:23:35 PM UTC Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >

Re: per-FIB socket binding

2024-12-23 Thread Jamie Landeg-Jones
Paul Vixie wrote: > i've been thinking along these lines for a few years now, since my vm server > is multi-fib. > each interface has a fib, mostly zero. for incoming TCP SYNs, i'd like to > carry that fib# into > the resulting PCB so that that fib's routing table and especially its default

Re: per-FIB socket binding

2024-12-23 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 21.12.2024 19:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: How much use are FIBs still these days?  Half of the original use cases I can think of could easily and better be overcome by using vnet jails with a physical or virtual interface (e.g, vcc) being delegated to the vnet. I wonder if anyone on FreeBSD is

[Bug 219655] Per-VNET soacceptqueue/somaxconn and numopensockets possible?

2024-12-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219655 Peter TKATCHENKO changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pe...@flytrace.com --- Comment

Re: per-FIB socket binding

2024-12-23 Thread Vadim Goncharov
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 13:29:01 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote: > On 21.12.2024 19:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > How much use are FIBs still these days?  Half of the original use cases > > I can think of could easily and better be overcome by using vnet jails > > with a physical or virtual interfac

Re: per-FIB socket binding

2024-12-23 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Any thoughts/comments? That all said with your opt-in approach if the code itself doesn't bring too many new complications I'd be happy with it (assuming FIBs still have a use case). Seems there's plenty people using multi-FIB in various scenarios s

Re: per-FIB socket binding

2024-12-23 Thread Paul Vixie
On Monday, December 23, 2024 7:23:35 PM UTC Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> Any thoughts/comments? > > > > That all said with your opt-in approach if the code itself doesn't bring > > too many new complications I'd be happy with it (assuming FIBs still > > h

[Bug 219655] Per-VNET soacceptqueue/somaxconn and numopensockets possible?

2024-12-23 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219655 --- Comment #15 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to Peter TKATCHENKO from comment #14) Nobody ever reported testing results. Can you test the patch? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.