https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252165
--- Comment #43 from Ali Abdallah ---
(In reply to Mikael Urankar from comment #42)
What do you mean by they don't work? Can you be more specific? Which usb
network device you are using?
I tested the patch (v2) on a couple of network devi
Hi,
I just re-read the ipfw man page about one_pass = 0.
# sysctl -d net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass
net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass: Only do a single pass through ipfw when using
dummynet(4)
I think next to dummynet, the definition also counts for netgraph and NAT
rules, but not for every rule. So I doubt t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252165
--- Comment #41 from Mikael Urankar ---
(In reply to Mikael Urankar from comment #40)
forget my last comment, I forgot to patch my src tree :/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252165
--- Comment #42 from Mikael Urankar ---
(In reply to Ali Abdallah from comment #39)
None of the patches (v1 or v2) work for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Hi, unfortunately that's not the case, as I have onepass to off, meaning
that after every rule, the packet continues to be processed by the next
rule (so the NAT does get reached).
Op do 14 nov 2024 om 11:17 schreef Ronald Klop :
> Op 02-11-2024 om 16:30 schreef Dries Michiels:
> > Hello,
> >
>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252165
--- Comment #40 from Mikael Urankar ---
(In reply to Ali Abdallah from comment #39)
I see UP / DOWN and network stall with v2.
I'll try with v1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
