[Bug 95277] fix IP Encapsulation mask_match() returning wrong results

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95277 --- Comment #12 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- I think this PR is no longer relevant after https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15617 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: CALL FOR TEST axgbe promisc mode

2024-10-02 Thread Mark Johnston
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 12:46:07PM +, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi, > > > On 1. Oct 2024, at 02:47, Zhenlei Huang wrote: > > > > The test plan is simple, either of the following should suffice: > > > > • Do traffic sniffing on axgbe interface. The interface will enter promisc > > mode and s

[Bug 95277] fix IP Encapsulation mask_match() returning wrong results

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95277 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | Summary|[netinet] [patch

[Bug 171228] [re] [patch] if_re - eeprom write issues

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171228 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | Assignee|b...@freebsd.or

[Bug 281560] gve (4) uma deadlock during high tcp throughput

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281560 --- Comment #18 from shail...@google.com --- (In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #14) Although I do not have access to the VMs to do `show pcpu`, I checked my notes to find this `ps` entry: 100438 Run CPU 11

[Bug 281560] gve (4) uma deadlock during high tcp throughput

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281560 --- Comment #19 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to shailend from comment #18) Locks (except spinlocks) do not have any magic properties WRT disabling scheduling. So it is absolutely fine for a thread owning a lock to be put off CPU

[Bug 237973] pf: implement egress keyword to simplify rules across different hardware

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237973 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable12?, | |mfc-stable11?

[Bug 240944] em(4): Crash with Intel 82571EB NIC with AMD Piledriver and Steamroller APUs

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240944 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable12?, | |mfc-stable11?

[Bug 256393] Issue with recreation of ppp/tun interfaces

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256393 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rgri...@freebsd.org | Flags|mfc-stable13?,

[Bug 238324] Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238324 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable12?, | |mfc-stable11?

[Bug 237072] netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]?

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237072 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable12?, | |mfc-stable11?

[Bug 281560] gve (4) uma deadlock during high tcp throughput

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281560 --- Comment #20 from shail...@google.com --- (In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #19) Thanks for the explanation. The iperf thread owning the lock and the driver thread looping on the cpu both have priority 4. The driver thread wa

[Bug 202510] [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause double MASTER situations

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202510 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable11?, | |mfc-stable10?,

[Bug 196944] [bge] [ipmi] regression IPMI access disabled when bge driver is loaded

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196944 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable10?, mfc-stable9? | --- Comment #13 from Mark Linimon

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable10?, mfc-stable9? | Keywords|patch

[Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206528 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable10? | CC|

[Bug 207261] netmap: Doesn't do TX sync with kqueue

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207261 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|maintainer-feedback?(vmaffi | |o...@freebsd.or

[Bug 281560] gve (4) uma deadlock during high tcp throughput

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281560 --- Comment #21 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to shailend from comment #20) Then, this is especially looks like a live-lock. User thread should not have the priority 4, it is in the range of priorities of the interrupt threads. S

[Bug 256579] arp(8) -S doesn't honour "blackhole" keyword

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256579 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|mfc-stable13?, | |mfc-stable12?,

[Bug 193452] Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadcom)

2024-10-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193452 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC|sbr...@freebsd.org |bugmeis...@freebsd.org