https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269643
Graham Perrin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
Keyword
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269643
Mike Karels changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kar...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269643
--- Comment #3 from Mike Karels ---
See also ip6addrctl, which shows and modifies the address selection policy; you
can make IPv4 preferred.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269643
Marek Zarychta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zarych...@plan-b.pwste.edu.
Hello,
running a small nanoBSD firewall/router appliance, the WAN interface (tun0) is
confugred via
SLAAC when it comes to IPv6. The allpliance is running in-kernel compiled IPFW.
The OS is
FreeBSD 13-STABLE, compiled on a recuurant weekly basis.
On a 24 hour basis, the ISP changes the IPv4 and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269643
--- Comment #5 from crypt47 ---
> Perhaps your script should use ping -4. btw, ping6 is just ping -6.
I understand the nature of the problem, but the idea is not to change scripts
because of changes in OS. (AND having two pings both of wh
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269643
--- Comment #6 from crypt47 ---
p.s.
Yes, it's not obvious to enable something IPv6 (ip6addrctl_enable="YES")
related to disable it (ip6addrctl_policy="ipv4_prefer").
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the b
