[Bug 264059] mlx4en(4) Mellanox ConnectX-3 10g eth not working in 13.1: mlx4_core0: Unable to determine PCI device chain minimum BW

2022-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264059 Michael Meiszl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mich...@meiszl.de --- Comment #13

[Bug 264059] mlx4en(4) Mellanox ConnectX-3 10g eth not working in 13.1: mlx4_core0: Unable to determine PCI device chain minimum BW

2022-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264059 --- Comment #14 from Hans Petter Selasky --- Maybe something can be done by devd and the device driver loading framework. Currently the mlx4en driver is old and not actively maintained. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 264059] mlx4en(4) Mellanox ConnectX-3 10g eth not working in 13.1: mlx4_core0: Unable to determine PCI device chain minimum BW

2022-09-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264059 --- Comment #15 from Michael Meiszl --- (In reply to Hans Petter Selasky from comment #14) if old and not maintained does not really matter as long as it works. I doubt it would do any harm to be automatically be included as the main mlx4 d

getaddrinfo error for existing host without requested address family

2022-09-27 Thread Mike Karels
I recently noticed the following behavior: % ping6 redrock ping6: Name does not resolve % host redrock redrock.karels.net has address 10.0.2.2 redrock.karels.net mail is handled by 10 mail.karels.net. % ping6 nonexistenthost ping6: Name does not resolve The first error message is misleading, beca

Re: getaddrinfo error for existing host without requested address family

2022-09-27 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:53:12PM -0500, Mike Karels wrote: > I recently noticed the following behavior: > > % ping6 redrock > ping6: Name does not resolve > % host redrock > redrock.karels.net has address 10.0.2.2 > redrock.karels.net mail is handled by 10 mail.karels.net. > % ping6 nonexistenth

Re: getaddrinfo error for existing host without requested address family

2022-09-27 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:53:12PM -0500, Mike Karels wrote: > The first error message is misleading, because the name *does* resolve, > but has no record, and it is the same error message as for a name > that truly does not exist. FWIW, the distinction between NODATA and NXDOMAIN is these d

Re: getaddrinfo error for existing host without requested address family

2022-09-27 Thread Mike Karels
On 27 Sep 2022, at 17:41, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:53:12PM -0500, Mike Karels wrote: > >> The first error message is misleading, because the name *does* resolve, >> but has no record, and it is the same error message as for a name >> that truly does not exist. > > F