Re: Current with RSS and EPAIR and without INET6.

Thanks! Pushed as 52bcdc5b809ea56cbdce0bd36499e4ae74780d2b. Kristof On 2 Mar 2022, at 23:24, Santiago Martinez wrote: > Hi Kristof and Zhenlei, > > I have updated the patch as requested (wrapped the ifdef INET|INET6 inside > the ifdef RSS). > > It now works without INET6 or without INET. (only

Re: Current with RSS and EPAIR and without INET6.

Thanks Kristof! Santi On 3/3/22 18:32, Kristof Provost wrote: Thanks! Pushed as 52bcdc5b809ea56cbdce0bd36499e4ae74780d2b. Kristof On 2 Mar 2022, at 23:24, Santiago Martinez wrote: Hi Kristof and Zhenlei, I have updated the patch as requested (wrapped the ifdef INET|INET6 inside the ifdef

FBSD-13 - Vale maximum virtual switches.

Hi Everyone, The other day had to simulate a network topology and I wanted to use vale switches instead of in-kernel bridges. After creating a few switches I notice that there was a hard limit of 8 switches ( that is clearly stated on the man page). For my simulation I needed 32 virtual swi

Re: FBSD-13 - Vale maximum virtual switches.

Hi, Yes, the maximum number of VALE bridges should definitely become a sysctl. I'll try to implement the change asap. Cheers, Vincenzo Il giorno gio 3 mar 2022 alle ore 19:07 Santiago Martinez < s...@codenetworks.net> ha scritto: > Hi Everyone, > > The other day had to simulate a network top

Re: FBSD-13 - Vale maximum virtual switches.

Thanks a lot Vincenzo. Santi On 3/3/22 23:03, Vincenzo Maffione wrote: Hi,   Yes, the maximum number of VALE bridges should definitely become a sysctl. I'll try to implement the change asap. Cheers,   Vincenzo Il giorno gio 3 mar 2022 alle ore 19:07 Santiago Martinez ha scritto: Hi