https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238411
--- Comment #22 from Abraham122x ---
What I can remember of my tests for my flashless NIC:
- Some FreeBSD 11 releases: possible to set WOL flags with ifconfig (important
is to avoid MCAST and UCAST flags, as they are triggered automatical
30.04.2021 23:32, Mark Johnston пишет:
> Second, netipsec unconditionally hands rx processing off to netisr
> threads for some reason, that's why changing the dispatch policy doesn't
> help. Maybe it's to help avoid running out of kernel stack space or to
> somehow avoid packet reordering in some
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238411
--- Comment #23 from Kaho Toshikazu ---
Created attachment 224609
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=224609&action=edit
patch:force to enable wol
(In reply to Abraham122x from comment #22)
I'm sorry, you are right.
30.04.2021 23:11, Özkan KIRIK пишет:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using FreeBSD stable/12 built world on 12 April 2021.
> my setup is:
> [freebsd host cc0] <> [cc1 - same freebsd, but jail]
>
> without IPsec, I can achieve easily to 20Gbps. (test was run with different
> source IPs using multiple ipe
Hello,
The flamegraph is attached.
# netstat -s
...
ipsec:
0 inbound packets violated process security policy
0 inbound packets failed due to insufficient memory
0 invalid inbound packets
0 outbound packets violated process security policy
0 outbound packets
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238411
--- Comment #24 from Abraham122x ---
(In reply to Kaho Toshikazu from comment #23)
I applied your patch (except sub "em_get_wakeup" because I don't have the new
enumerations in my package) and can confirm it does exactly what I need:
ifcon
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241954
Lutz Donnerhacke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
CC|
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254333
Richard Scheffenegger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|
> On 20 April 2021, at 14:12, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> I suspect this is an issue with the resolver, but it could also be in host.
> I have the following in /etc/resolv.conf:
>
> # Generated by resolvconf
> nameserver fe80::213:72ff:fec3:180f%bge0
> nameserver fe80::120c:6bff:fee9:cdf7%bge0
>
>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254333
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|Closed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203476
Kevin Bowling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
12 matches
Mail list logo