https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230996
--- Comment #28 from Kaho Toshikazu ---
Created attachment 224588
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=224588&action=edit
iflib-vlan patch
It contains a correction of iflib side with debug code,
and it does not conflic
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238411
--- Comment #21 from Kaho Toshikazu ---
(In reply to Abraham122x from comment #20)
FreeBSD 12 and 13 have almost same code but 11 has difference.
I think that wol capability is not set with these type devices on FreeBSD 11,
then you can no
I've pulled the latest stable/13 branch and make buildworld.
Same configuration and same usage, ping works between two sides, iperf can
connect to server but no data transferred. throughput is around 10Kbps.
I tried both with and without netipsec/ipsec_input.c patch, but no change.
There is someth
This bug is related to CCR. @Navdeep Parhar , @John Baldwin
if you are interested to fix this bug related with CCR, I
can test if you provide patches. Test environment is explained in my first
email on this thread.
@Mark Johnston Now again on stable/13,
- with aesni, without netipsec/ipsec_inpu
On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 04:30:59PM +0300, Özkan KIRIK wrote:
> This bug is related to CCR. @Navdeep Parhar , @John Baldwin
> if you are interested to fix this bug related with CCR, I
> can test if you provide patches. Test environment is explained in my first
> email on this thread.
>
> @Mark Jo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255507
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ema...@freebsd.org
Status|N
the previous flamegraph is captured while iperf client (jail) sends to
iperf server.
the attached flamegraph to this mail is captured while iperf configured
full-duplex mode. Throughput is about up: 1.5 Gbps down: 1.5 Gbps total: 3
Gbps
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 11:57 PM Özkan KIRIK wrote:
> Hello
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230996
--- Comment #29 from Kevin Bowling ---
(In reply to Kaho Toshikazu from comment #28)
Can you explain how this helps? It looks to me that the current
iflib_vlan_register compares two softcs as expected.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230996
--- Comment #30 from Kaho Toshikazu ---
(In reply to Kevin Bowling from comment #29)
EVENTHANDLER_REGISTER seems to require (struct ifnet *)
which typedef if_t at if_var.h. When a vlan interface is created/destroyed,
the vlan_config/unconf
