https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015
--- Comment #2 from Kristof Provost ---
Given the second backtrace and the other bugs (254309, 254244) without
if_bridge showing NULL mbufs I'm fairly confident this isn't a bridge bug.
It's certainly worth updating to make sure you have t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253583
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||mfc-stable13+
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253790
--- Comment #5 from cr...@rlwinm.de ---
This PR has been overcome by events (depending on your point of view). For now
WireGuard has been pulled from FreeBSD base. Development will continue out of
tree for now.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253790
Bernhard Froehlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(kp@fre |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015
--- Comment #4 from Kristof Provost ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #3)
It may already be fixed. Reporter needs to re-test with a build that includes
e9f029831fa5747ae1b405f5716c52cb4ebf1e04 (or the cherry-picked equivalent on
w
> On 21 Mar 2021, at 14:41, Jason Breitman
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for sharing as this sounds exactly like my issue.
>
> I had implemented the change below on 3/8/2021 and have experienced the NFS
> hang after that.
> Do I need to reboot or umount / mount all of the clients and then I will be
>
> On 21 Mar 2021, at 23:21, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> Youssef GHORBAL wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>>> On 17 Mar 2021, at 18:17, Jason Breitman
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please review the details below and let me know if there is a setting that
>>> I should apply to my FreeBSD NFS Server or if there is
Agreed. I had made the changes on the FreeBSD Server side and was suggesting
that a new TCP connection needed to be established between the client and
server for the settings to take effect.
I rebooted all of my Debian clients on Sunday to achieve that goal,
establishing a new NFSv4 TCP connect
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015
--- Comment #5 from shamaz.ma...@gmail.com ---
Bugs 254309, 254244 are irrelevant to my case.
The line net.link.ether.ipfw=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf causes all the trouble. I
provided my firewall rules, so you can see what ipfw does to layer2 f
I am going to create a FreeBSD PR for this, so that this
does not get forgotten.
If anyone has a problem with me cutting/pasting their
comments in this thread into the PR, please email me soon.
(If I don't hear from you soon, I'll assume you are ok with it.)
Same goes for a post to linux-...@ver.
Hi,
I was talking with gnn and kevans on IRC about the tcp testsuite
(https://github.com/freebsd-net/tcp-testsuite).
Currently we maintain this in ports, although the way the port is set
up doesn't make a lot of sense because the tests are stack specific
and we don't account for different FreeBSD
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://cgit.freebsd.org/sr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254244
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://reviews.freebsd.org
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 7:31 PM Kevin Bowling
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was talking with gnn and kevans on IRC about the tcp testsuite
> (https://github.com/freebsd-net/tcp-testsuite).
>
> Currently we maintain this in ports, although the way the port is set
> up doesn't make a lot of sense because the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254478
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
Keyword
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254015
--- Comment #7 from shamaz.ma...@gmail.com ---
> Please test a kernel with e9f02983 applied to confirm that the issue is still
> reproducible
Yes it is reproducible
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
19 matches
Mail list logo