aleksandr.fedorov_itglobal.com added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> iflib.c:2916
>
> #define TXD_NOTIFY_COUNT(txq) (((txq)->ift_size / (txq)->ift_update_freq)-1)
> static inline qidx_t
I am worried that if the user sets the value to 1, then this will lead to
division by zero and to kern
TSPB Birlikte Eğitim Mesleki Gelişim Eğitimleri
Bülteni Daha İyi Görüntülemek İçin Tıklayın
[http://track-2.email-bouncer.com/0111D2389711|11009c00fdf926bb981d59ee664f79715a6a|5230|1110469|11002366.html]TSPB
Birlikte Eğitim Mesleki Gelişim Eğitimleri
"Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu"
23.06.2020 12:33, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> Can you agree with that logic Eugene?
I'm not against keeping routed(8) in the base while it has happy users raising
voice for it.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
gallatin added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> iflib.c:590
> +int iflib_tx_update_freq = IFLIB_DEFAULT_TX_UPDATE_FREQ;
> +SYSCTL_UINT(_net_iflib, OID_AUTO, tx_update_freq, CTLFLAG_RW,
> +&iflib_tx_update_freq, IFLIB_DEFAULT_TX_UPDATE_FREQ,
Can you please make this a tunable as
neel_neelc.org updated this revision to Diff 73520.
neel_neelc.org retitled this revision from "Add sysctl net.iflib.tx_update_freq
to set transmit descriptor update frequency" to "Add tunable
net.iflib.tx_update_freq to set transmit descriptor update frequency".
neel_neelc.org edited the summary
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237649
John W. O'Brien changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@saltant.com
--- Comment #10