[Differential] D23737: nat64: Get the IPv4 address from a NAT64 address when comparing addresses in a ICMP translate

ae requested changes to this revision. ae added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. The patch is not correct. IPv4 address can be embedded in different places depending from configuration. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://review

vtnet IFF_NEEDSEPOCH?

Hi, I’ve been playing around with a risc-v qemu image, and run into this panic with vtnet: DHCPDISCOVER on vtnet0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 panic: Assertion in_epoch(net_epoch_preempt) failed at /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:1093 cpuid = 0 time = 1581981733

[Bug 187835] ngctl(8) strange behavior when adding more than 530 vlan through nethraph

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187835 l...@donnerhacke.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@donnerhacke.de --- Comme

terrible if_vmx / vmxnet3 rx performance with lro (post iflib)

At work we are seeing some rather terrible vmxnet3 rx performance when lro is enabled. We have it enabled because with the pre-iflib vmxnet3 it improved the performance quite significantly. For example, in a particular test configuration we could receive ~1 Gbps w/o lro and ~1.8 Gbps with it. W

wireguard implementation in progress with zero coordination or communication with wireguard project? can we help?

Hi Matthew, I'm Jason, the lead of the WireGuard project. Somebody brought it to my attention that Netgate has been sponsoring you to write a WireGuard kernel implementation for FreeBSD. What a terrific development! However, this is in fact the first I've heard of such an initiative, which is qu

Re: wireguard implementation in progress with zero coordination or communication with wireguard project? can we help?

Hi Jason - I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I can’t count the number of nascent kernel projects that have come up in discussion over the years and ultimately come to nothing. I started by getting the OpenBSD bits to build on FreeBSD. However, the implementation in Open is not really a very good s

RE: Southern California 2020 Linux Expo Emails

Hi, Writing to check if you have received my below email sent you earlier. Just pick a number that best describes your response, 1. Yes, I'm interested & Send counts and cost of list. 2. No - Opt-Out -Not interested Let me know if you are interested so that I can provide you the cost and

[Differential] D23737: nat64: Get the IPv4 address from a NAT64 address when comparing addresses in a ICMP translate

neel_neelc.org updated this revision to Diff 68488. neel_neelc.org edited the summary of this revision. neel_neelc.org added a comment. Here, I also compare the destination addresses. Is this what you want? REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://reviews.fre

[Differential] D23737: nat64: Get the IPv4 address from a NAT64 address when comparing addresses in a ICMP translate

neel_neelc.org updated this revision to Diff 68489. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23737?vs=68488&id=68489 CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23737/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23737 A

Re: wireguard implementation in progress with zero coordination or communication with wireguard project? can we help?

Hey K, On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:33 PM K. Macy wrote: > I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I can’t count the number of nascent kernel > projects that have come up in discussion over the years and ultimately come > to nothing. Do you mean that the FreeBSD one might not work out, or you're skepti

Re: wireguard implementation in progress with zero coordination or communication with wireguard project? can we help?

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:09 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Hey K, > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:33 PM K. Macy wrote: > > I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I can’t count the number of nascent > > kernel projects that have come up in discussion over the years and > > ultimately come to nothin

Re: vtnet IFF_NEEDSEPOCH?

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:52:09AM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote: K> Hi, K> K> I’ve been playing around with a risc-v qemu image, and run into this panic K> with vtnet: K> K> DHCPDISCOVER on vtnet0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 K> panic: Assertion in_epoch(net_epoch_preempt) fail

Re: vtnet IFF_NEEDSEPOCH?

On 18 Feb 2020, at 20:37, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:52:09AM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote: K> Hi, K> K> I’ve been playing around with a risc-v qemu image, and run into this panic K> with vtnet: K> K> DHCPDISCOVER on vtnet0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 5 K> panic:

Re: Issue with BGP router / high interrupt / Chelsio / FreeBSD 12.1

On 2/14/20 2:58 PM, BulkMailForRudy wrote: pmcstat -S inst_retired.any -Tw1 I had time to run pmcstat during a larger TX load on Chelsio T6 card. I'm loosing a hope on using FreeBSD as one of my edge routers outside of 10Gbps ports. *Start (been running for 4 days), cc1: RX 2.3Gbps / 130

How to work with in 1GbE network ?

Hi, all I wonder how to work ixgbe in 1GbE network. I tried to test in below: internet | +---++ | Netgear JGS516 | +---+-+--+ +--+ | +-+ 13.0-CURRENT(r356739)| src_host | +--+ |+-

[Bug 208205] re0 watchdog timeout

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208205 Ralf Wostrack changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ralf.wostr...@gmx.de --- Comment #