Hello,
I'd like to NAT outbound traffic from two different private networks
through two different interfaces, with CARP on top. I have 4 public IPS
available (193.x.x.89, 193.x.x.90, 193.x.x.91, 193.x.x.92).
I have two redundant router/firewall running FreeBSD 12 with CARP and
PF with the follo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240787
Mark Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #12
Hi Julien,
It's not clear why you are trying to assign multiple carp IP address to
two different interfaces from within the same IP subnet. Are you trying
to fail over a 2nd carp address or are you trying to improve
throughput/redundancy? If you just want to fail over a 2nd carp address,
assi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240787
Gleb Smirnoff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:20:34AM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> Hi Julien,
Hi Matthew,
>
> It's not clear why you are trying to assign multiple carp IP address to
> two different interfaces from within the same IP subnet. Are you trying
> to fail over a 2nd carp address or are you trying to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240787
--- Comment #14 from Ed Maste ---
Too late for 12.1, but merging to stable/12 before 12.2 is probably feasible
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
fre
On 10/8/2019 10:58 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:20:34AM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Matthew,
It's not clear why you are trying to assign multiple carp IP address to
two different interfaces from within the same IP subnet. Are you trying
to fail over a 2nd
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240608
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||240700
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240609
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||240700
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236724
--- Comment #17 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
I'd like to add that marius@'s approach in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21924
has the same effect – from the operator's view – like the original tested
D21769.
Once the interface was "up", link s
Hi All
I have FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE #0 r343863 VM with 2 CPU and vxnet3 NIC.
This host uses many if_ipsec and strongswan-5.7.2 to make site-to-site
ipsec connections.
When I use `tcpdump -nn -i src and esp` then
I got many reordered IPsec packets.
Does tcpdump give me a real picture and I
On 10/8/19 8:58 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:20:34AM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Matthew,
It's not clear why you are trying to assign multiple carp IP address to
two different interfaces from within the same IP subnet. Are you trying
to fail over a 2nd car
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240787
Julian Elischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jul...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240787
--- Comment #16 from Julian Elischer ---
though one could implement the old cookie too and translate to some set of
defaults in the new scheme.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Tried updating from r353072 to r353334 and getting the following panic
reproducibly on boot (starting dhclient?):
panic: sleeping in an epoch section
cpuid = 5
time = 1570591558
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame
0xfe00af780140
vpanic() at vpa
15 matches
Mail list logo
