[Bug 240685] netgraph/ng_vlan_rotate: IEEE 802.1ad VLAN manipulation netgraph node type (new type)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240685 --- Comment #3 from l...@donnerhacke.de --- This node is part of an A10-NSP development. See https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Breitband/NGA_NGN/NGA-Forum/aktuell

[Bug 240685] netgraph/ng_vlan_rotate: IEEE 802.1ad VLAN manipulation netgraph node type (new type)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240685 --- Comment #4 from l...@donnerhacke.de --- Created attachment 207732 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=207732&action=edit Updated patch for share/man/man4/ng_vlan_rotate.4 I'm sorry for my errors in the man page. Th

[Bug 240685] netgraph/ng_vlan_rotate: IEEE 802.1ad VLAN manipulation netgraph node type (new type)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240685 l...@donnerhacke.de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #207625|0 |1 is patch|

Re: BBR patch on latest src, build failed.

Yes, I saw your email. As my post, I can build the kernel successfully with revision 352483. But can not build with latest src. On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 2:39 PM vm finance wrote: > I have successfully built BBR after checking out latest codebase. > I'm also on svn revision: 352483... > > Did you

[Bug 233952] if_jme: Does not send/receive packets after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrade

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952 Mark Johnston changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |ma...@freebsd.org -- You are rec

[Bug 233952] if_jme: Does not send/receive packets after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrade

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952 --- Comment #19 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: markj Date: Mon Sep 23 14:29:05 UTC 2019 New revision: 352625 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352625 Log: Revert r316820. Despite ap

[Bug 233952] if_jme: Does not send/receive packets after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrade

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233952 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||240700 --- Comment #20 from Kubila

[Bug 236724] igb(4): Interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236724 Krzysztof Galazka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krzysztof.gala...@intel.com --

代研缥

kfp1118薇 ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[Bug 239118] iflib: Panic in ether_output_frame on ESXi

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239118 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|iflib, panic|crash Summary|in ESXi:

dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ?

It seems that the userland component of ipfw/dummynet uses int for the bandwidth represented in bit/s. Also, int is used for passing that value from the userland to the kernel. What would be the best way to extend this? Just use a larger type? Or maybe add another field to try to preserve KBI b

rpc.statd already ipv6 clean?

Hi everyone, Just as mentioned in [1], rpc.statd is not ipv6 clean. Although I have been through the code, and didn't found any issues until now. The code conditionally checks for ipv6/ipv4 everywhere and uses ipv6 compatible functions. As per one old commit [2], seems rpc.statd was already made