On 28/08/2019 24:45, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
28.08.2019 3:59, Victor Gamov wrote:
sysctl.conf = net.link.ether.ipfw=1 net.link.bridge.ipfw=1
net.link.bridge.ipfw_arp=1 net.link.bridge.pfil_member=1
net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit=100 net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1
=
Do you really use ipfw f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239982
j.david.li...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution
28.08.2019 17:18, Victor Gamov wrote:
>> Why do you need to filter ARP on bridge? That's unusial. VLANs are
>> isolated by default and by definition, unless you explicitly enable
>> inter-vlan routing and setup your routing table.
>
> May be I have some misunderstood here but...
> If I have many
On 28/08/2019 18:48, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
28.08.2019 17:18, Victor Gamov wrote:
Why do you need to filter ARP on bridge? That's unusial. VLANs are
isolated by default and by definition, unless you explicitly enable
inter-vlan routing and setup your routing table.
May be I have some misunder
28.08.2019 23:58, Victor Gamov wrote:
> P.S. Two questions about rules syntax optimization. What is more effective:
> skipto tablearg udp from any to table(AllMcast_out)
> or
> skipto tablearg udp from any to table(AllMcast_out) out xmit vlan*
Can't tell, this heavily depends on table contents
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239704
--- Comment #5 from Greg Rivers ---
Another data point: I get the same result on a ProLiant DL380 Gen9 with the
same NIC. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to facilitate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
