ospf redistribute into openbgpd overwrites directly connected routes

2018-07-30 Thread Tobias Urdin
Hello, I have a setup where we connect a OSPF area with a edge router, this edge router then has a BGP peer to my router where it redistributes all OSPF routes into the BGP feed to my router. My router is running FreeBSD 11.1 with openbgpd root@myrouter:~ # uname -a FreeBSD dr20-1-sto1 11.1-R

Re: ospf redistribute into openbgpd overwrites directly connected routes

2018-07-30 Thread Tobias Urdin
Should note that I can resolve this by filtering the incoming prefixes with: deny from group "peering AS" prefix 172.20.104.0/22 prefixlen = 22 Which I'm doing right now to workaround the problem and being able to continue working but I don't understand why openbgpd would overwrite directly

Re: ospf redistribute into openbgpd overwrites directly connected routes

2018-07-30 Thread Eugene Grosbein
30.07.2018 21:06, Tobias Urdin wrote: > I have a setup where we connect a OSPF area with a edge router, this edge > router then has a BGP peer to my router > where it redistributes all OSPF routes into the BGP feed to my router. > > My router is running FreeBSD 11.1 with openbgpd > > root@myrou

Re: ospf redistribute into openbgpd overwrites directly connected routes

2018-07-30 Thread Tobias Urdin
On 07/30/2018 05:08 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: 30.07.2018 21:06, Tobias Urdin wrote: I have a setup where we connect a OSPF area with a edge router, this edge router then has a BGP peer to my router where it redistributes all OSPF routes into the BGP feed to my router. My router is running Fr

[Bug 222314] ifconfig epair create panics the kernel (arm64)

2018-07-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222314 Andrew Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@freebsd.org --- Comment #2

[Bug 181741] [kernel] [patch] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendmsg(2))

2018-07-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181741 --- Comment #19 from Mark Johnston --- https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16515 https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16516 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ freeb

RE: Bug 227720

2018-07-30 Thread Allanson, Matt J.
In reference to https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227720 , we applied the patch to enable garbage collection. Rebuilt the image and installed it, then set net.gc.enabled=1 as well as in /etc/sysctl.conf and it continued to fail. Here is the most recent backtrace: (kgdb) bt #0 0

IPSec StrongSwan error sending to PF_KEY socket: Invalid argument

2018-07-30 Thread Miroslav Lachman
I am trying to setup IPSec tunnel between VirtualBox gues (FreeBSD 10.4) on one side and AWS EC3 AMI (FreeBSD 10.4) on other side. Both sides have kernel with IPSEC and IPSEC_NAT_T but I am not able to make it work. It works if I make similar setup with two VirtualBox instances (no NAT), but whe

[Bug 131876] [socket] FD leak by receiving SCM_RIGHTS by recvmsg with small control message buffer

2018-07-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131876 --- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: markj Date: Tue Jul 31 00:48:08 UTC 2018 New revision: 336957 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336957 Log: Add a regression test related

[Bug 206053] kqueue support code of netmap causes panic

2018-07-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206053 David Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |d...@freebsd.org Statu

[Bug 181741] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendmsg(2))

2018-07-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181741 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[kernel] [patch] Packet |Packet loss when 'control'