It prints these messages when WiFi is used.
What is the reason?
Thanks,
Yuri
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Most likely threading only part of problem with iperf3.
As I say before - I'm check iperf3 in paralel by running multiple instanse on
diferent's ports
Speed is always same.
But maybe 2-3 instance to few for noticible result's.
For me most confusion was speed aroud 10Gbit on pure link showed
Am 30.05.2018 um 10:43 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij:
Most likely threading only part of problem with iperf3.
As I say before - I'm check iperf3 in paralel by running multiple instanse on
diferent's ports
Speed is always same.
But maybe 2-3 instance to few for noticible result's.
For me most co
I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it doesn't
work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and work just fine on
11.1R/amd64, otherwise I'd be fired this used to work ~ 1 month ago, both
on my desktop, and my laptop, and now doesn't.
Have I mis-config
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it
> doesn't work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and work just
> fine on 11.1R/amd64, otherwise I'd be fired this used to work ~ 1 month
> ago, both on
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>
> > I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it
> > doesn't work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and work just
> > fine on 11.1R/a
Bengt Ahlgren writes:
> Doug Ambrisko writes:
>
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 02:17:21PM +0300, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
>> | Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
>> | > Is there a standard "rc.conf" way to configure 8021x authentication on
>> | > wired ethernet?
>> |
>> | looks like it's to be something like: ifco
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180722
--- Comment #3 from Anil Gulati ---
I am the reporter but I don't have a working BSD install right now, sorry.
I guess I can say it won't affect me if you close the bug report.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it
> > > doesn't work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and work just
> >
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a process for testing the VF drivers (ixgbe igb, etc)
> in FreeBSD without actually firing up linux to instantiate a VM or using
> EC2?
We have native support for creating VFs for ixl and ixgbe (and cxgbe).
For igb you're out
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it
> > > >
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180722
Steve Wills changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||swi...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180722
Steve Wills changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |blueto...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 15:40, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it>
> doesn't work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and
> work just> fine on 11.1R/amd64, otherwise I'd be fired this used to work
> ~ 1> month ago, both o
Am 30.05.2018 um 16:45 schrieb Ryan Stone:
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sean Bruno wrote:
Does anyone have a process for testing the VF drivers (ixgbe igb, etc)
in FreeBSD without actually firing up linux to instantiate a VM or using
EC2?
We have native support for creating VFs for ixl and
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realise
Harry,
I wasn’t aware of anyone desiring vf support for igb but I’ll take a look
at it for you if you can test -current with patches when I’m ready. My
motive is more to validate and refine the iflib functionality and this is a
good exercise.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:20 AM Harry Schmalzbauer
wr
Am 30.05.2018 um 17:53 schrieb Kevin Bowling:
Harry,
I wasn’t aware of anyone desiring vf support for igb but I’ll take a
look at it for you if you can test -current with patches when I’m ready.
My motive is more to validate and refine the iflib functionality and
this is a good exercise.
Ch
I think the biggest hurdle is that for igb, the pf and vf should be split. That
was being considered at the same time as the ixgbe/ixgbevf split, but there was
little interest at the time.
Jeff
On 5/30/18, 9:13 AM, "owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf of Harry
Schmalzbauer"
wrote:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60293
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
On Wed, 30 May 2018 17:46:06 +0200, "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
>
On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 17:46, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > > ifconfig_lo1_aliases="inet 10.241.0.0-15/16"
> > > > > > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
> > > > > > inet 10.241.0.0 netmask 0x
> > > > > > inet 10.241.0.1 netmask 0x
> > > > > > inet 10.2
> On Wed, 30 May 2018 17:46:06 +0200, "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > > > > > wrote:
Could you please try 334117 vs 334118 and see if 334118 introduces
this regression?
-M
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2018 17:46:06 +0200, "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> > > >
> On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 17:46, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > > > ifconfig_lo1_aliases="inet 10.241.0.0-15/16"
>
> > > > > > > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
> > > > > > > inet 10.241.0.0 netmask 0x
> > > > > > > inet 10.241.0.1 netmask 0x
> > > > > > >
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157182
Peter Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petercjclif...@gmail.com
--- Comme
On Thu, May 31, 2018, 00:13 Rodney W. Grimes <
freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 17:46, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > > > > ifconfig_lo1_aliases="inet 10.241.0.0-15/16"
> >
> > > > > > > > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu
> 16384
> > > > > > > > inet 10
27 matches
Mail list logo
