Erk. I'll go see if I can figure out what's going on.
Thanks! This is really quite grr-y.
-a
On 21 March 2018 at 23:35, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 22.03.2018 09:23, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Trap cause = 2 (TLB miss (load or instr. fetch) - kernel mode)
>> [ thread pid 11 tid 100010 ]
>>
On 22.03.2018 10:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Erk. I'll go see if I can figure out what's going on.
>
> Thanks! This is really quite grr-y.
>>> Trap cause = 2 (TLB miss (load or instr. fetch) - kernel mode)
>>> [ thread pid 11 tid 100010 ]
>>> Stopped at 0
>>> db> bt
>>> Tracing pid 11 tid 10001
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:52:39PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 22.03.2018 10:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Erk. I'll go see if I can figure out what's going on.
> >
> > Thanks! This is really quite grr-y.
> >>> Trap cause = 2 (TLB miss (load or instr. fetch) - kernel mode)
> >>> [ thread pi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
while having no any problem with separate (lagg less) mode, when I use
ether or wlan without aggregating, I am still experiencing severe problem
with ether <-> wlan failover
after upgrade to 11.1 I decided to give another try to the handbook Exam
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 02:19:43PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
[...]
> P.S. It is my assumption that the kind of thing I'm looking for, if
> it exists at all, will be found somewhere below the application layer.
> I do not rule out however that there may be some way of differentiating
> the
On 22.03.2018 16:57, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
> hi,
>
> while having no any problem with separate (lagg less) mode, when I use
> ether or wlan without aggregating, I am still experiencing severe problem
> with ether <-> wlan failover
>
> after upgrade to 11.1 I decided to give another try to the han
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>
> It will work, if you will change ethernet's MAC address to one, what
> wlan interface have.
>
in my previous attempts it was working this way *only* when interface
was in promiscious mode
but I'll try it again, thanks
22.03.2018 20:57, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
> while having no any problem with separate (lagg less) mode, when I use
> ether or wlan without aggregating, I am still experiencing severe problem
> with ether <-> wlan failover
>
> after upgrade to 11.1 I decided to give another try to the handbook Examp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>
> It will work, if you will change ethernet's MAC address to one, what
> wlan interface have.
>
yes, for me it works *only* if the interface is in promiscious mode,
just have checked
BUT! what finally helped me is this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> You should try forcing lagg to use MAC of wireless card instead of fabricated
> one:
> ifconfig lagg0 ether $(ifconfig wlan0 | awk '/hwaddr/ {print $2}')
>
as I wrote in previous message, it works *only* when interface i
On 03/22/18 09:02, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 02:19:43PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
[...]
P.S. It is my assumption that the kind of thing I'm looking for, if
it exists at all, will be found somewhere below the application layer.
I do not rule out however that the
oh and xcompiled with gcc-6.x .
-a
On 22 March 2018 at 09:09, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I dunno yet; this is a very embedded mips74k box. :)
>
>
> -a
>
> On 22 March 2018 at 06:00, Olivier Houchard wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:52:39PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>>> On 22.03.2018 10:31
I dunno yet; this is a very embedded mips74k box. :)
-a
On 22 March 2018 at 06:00, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:52:39PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> On 22.03.2018 10:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> > Erk. I'll go see if I can figure out what's going on.
>> >
>> > Thanks
Hi,
I keep telling people that right now it's not something I at least
have time to fix up. :)
-a
On 22 March 2018 at 08:37, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>>
>> It will work, if you will change ethernet's MAC address to
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:09:37AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> oh and xcompiled with gcc-6.x .
>
>
I'm not very knowledgable with mips. Is it possible gcc wrongly
generated an instruction that is not supported by mips74k ?
I suppose not, or it wouldn't lead to a TLB miss.
Olivier
>
> On 22 M
In message <4db72389-d167-4152-a15f-4710c54b2...@your.org>,
Kevin Day wrote:
>Does the ssh-keyscan tool do what you want?
I never knew about that tool until now. But yes, indeed, that may be
the exact kind of magic I was looking for.
Thank you.
__
In message <201803220250.w2m2owmf024...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>,
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>You are not going to prove the "control of the exact same Bad Actor"
>without a warrant to search and seize.
Well, as someone else noted, if two IP addresses yield the exact same
SSH key, that is fairly
In message <20180322140233.ga79...@staff.retn.net>,
Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
>DNS: if both A and A' running open recursive DNS servers (bad idea in
>modern internet, but..) it's possible to use TTL field to differentiate.
>Scenario: create some DNS record with good enough TTL of one hour. Ask
In message <4ce048ad-873e-795e-aae0-8d795d9bb...@kicp.uchicago.edu>,
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>If A and A' do resolve beyond their SOA for clients outside of their
>domain. That was vulnerable for abuse, and hardly anybody does that
>these days. Am I missing something?
As I understand it, sadly
On 2018-Mar-21 13:50:26 -0700, "Ronald F. Guilmette"
wrote:
>
>In message <5ab2c0b1.3020...@grosbein.net>,
>Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
>>It does not mean you need to stick with raw sockets API.
>>libpcap can be used too, as I've shown in previous letter.
>
>Thank you. If zmap ends up not suiting
>
> In message <201803220250.w2m2owmf024...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>,
> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>
> >You are not going to prove the "control of the exact same Bad Actor"
> >without a warrant to search and seize.
>
> Well, as someone else noted, if two IP addresses yield the exact same
> SSH k
In message <201803221856.w2miurjh027...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>,
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>> Well, as someone else noted, if two IP addresses yield the exact same
>> SSH key, that is fairly definitive.
>
>Wrong, as someone else pointed out that is simply a mater of
>copying the /etc/ssh/*host*
@sunp...@freebsd.org: as you are the (brand new?) maintainer of the
miniDLNA port for FreeBSD, my hopes are with you :D
tl;dr
"setsockopt" should be replaced by "sourcefilter" (at least in
minissdp.c's "AddMulticastMembership)
On 22.03.18 01:15, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
...
Try as a very fi
Hi John, did you ever try out my version?
Julian
On 7/1/18 4:06 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 7/1/18 4:02 am, John Lyon wrote:
Thanks for the clarification and all the help.
After Marko clarified that that edges/hooks are bidirectional, I
was able to get it working WAN to LAN and LAN to WAN
24 matches
Mail list logo
